yesterday at 9:34 PM
It's so refreshing browsing this compared to YouTube, it feels like I don't have to constantly be on high alert at being baited into some trap. Makes you wonder what kind of internet could be possible if all these tech giants weren't just optimizing for engagement and addiction.
today at 6:04 AM
YouTube mobile app has a "your custom feed" where you supply English language prompts and get a relevant custom feed. My go-to has been "new and unseen science & technology videos predominantly from people I follow but occasionally interspersed with others' you think I might like in a similar vein"
today at 7:43 AM
To save others the disappointment I just felt: this is only available in the US.
today at 6:56 AM
Genuinely curious, is this sarcasm? I don't use any YouTube mobile app, but doesn't "new and unseen [...] videos predominantly from people I follow but occasionally interspersed with others' you think I might like in a similar vein" just sound analogous to "recommend me videos I'd like to see".
today at 7:05 AM
It is also available in the PWA. Yes, it's a real feature with a Gemini-powered prompt. Yes, GP describes a prompt that approximates the actual algorithm.
I just wrote "nothing but Sesame Street parodies" and the feed does what it says on the tin.
today at 12:40 AM
Shameless self-promotion: https://github.com/andunieee/cathode (gtk4 desktop app) can give you a non-bait interface to YouTube that works.
Now this project gives me some ideas of things to implement:
- pick the thumbnail from the middle of the video
- allow curated subscriptions, i.e. I subscribe to some curated list made by someone (in this case it could be the database of videos Karpathy has gathered from HN, but there could be others)
At some point I was almost implementing DeArrow support, but using it for a while I don't think it is too great, often the alternative titles people give are unreliable, and honestly I don't know how they exist without being spammed or trolled to death. I do have SponsorBlock support though (I feel like SponsorBlock would work better if it allowed high-quality AI bots to submit blocks though).
today at 6:58 AM
> can give you a non-bait interface to YouTube that works
Is there something like this for Twitter?
today at 5:46 AM
Very interesting. Does it have dark mode?
today at 2:55 AM
> pick the thumbnail from the middle of the video
Sounds like you may be interested in DeArrow: https://dearrow.ajay.app
SponsorBlock is related too: https://sponsor.ajay.app
today at 3:37 AM
So basically how YouTube worked in 2005? :)
today at 12:58 AM
Can I search with your app for ONLY the latest uploaded videos and filter for content length?
Will it display whatever bullshit recommendations YouTube feeds?
Really looking for an option to only have "current stuff" - YT constantly recommends me stuff from 3 years ago which I already watched, even with my highly curated account.
today at 1:41 AM
Global search is provided by YouTube, so I can't guarantee anything.
I could add some local filters if necessary, but doesn't YouTube already provide its own filters based on when the video was published? Cathode exposes these.
yesterday at 9:47 PM
It makes me yearn for what we lost. I remember when the Internet was all like this page, and it was bloody wonderful. I hope we get to a point where hosting becomes functionally free, and the brain rotting advertisement spam becomes a thing of the past.
today at 1:10 AM
But we didn't lose it - it's right here, and if this one goes down you can make your own with 2 hours of an Opus 5.5 subscription. Honestly, I whipped up something similar to this the other day for Arxiv papers.
today at 7:36 AM
Please do elaborate, i am very much interested in how you did it.
today at 3:38 AM
Wait, what's the Arxiv equivalent of filtering out brainrot?
today at 6:44 AM
Watching youtube with Firefox + ublock origins still gives you an experience free of the peppering of insufferable ad breaks
today at 7:36 AM
The same Firefox that, on android at least, asks you if you want to open the native YouTube app (or be asked again next time) for every link to YouTube or every time you type youtube.com in the url bar? But that's even more annoying than the ads!
yesterday at 10:51 PM
[dead]
yesterday at 10:20 PM
Same feeling. For me the trap was mostly titles and thumbnails, A/B tested to trap my time.
I made myself a thing that tries to answer the title + thumbnail from the transcript, and shows me the answer if there is a good one. Never launched it, but it's at youtldr.com if you want to try.
today at 7:37 AM
Similar to DeArrow except with AI right?
yesterday at 11:39 PM
Fantastic domain. I hope you get whatever you want out of it.
today at 1:17 AM
Have been sitting on it for 8+ years. :)
My plan was to try to find the "answer" for videos in comments. Never really got around doing it, but LLMs make the possibilities more interesting and easier.
Edit: this is also a good opportunity to ship something like this: https://hn.youtldr.com, like Karpathy's HackerTube, but with the new videos from "HN-vetted" channels.
yesterday at 9:57 PM
today at 8:04 AM
Exactly what I also felt "refreshing" !
today at 2:58 AM
It’s true, we are just optimizing for engagement, which is a first-order (and our best current) approximation of happiness. I’m hopeful that as the attention economy evolves, we will evolve objective metrics that more accurately reflect the long-term health and happiness of users.
today at 3:58 AM
...engagement, which is a first-order (and our best current) approximation of happiness.
Engagement is better seen as an approximation of how many ads you are likely to be able to serve to that user.
yesterday at 10:00 PM
the recommendation system is so sad, its stealing good content from all of us. they just churn the same click back crap
yesterday at 10:34 PM
Opinions are my own.
One of the positive effects of the recent AI wave is that it shows more folks are warming up to the idea of paying a subscription for tech. Perhaps, the next generation will grow up with tech that doesn't rely on addiction to earn ads money. The downside is that the gap between "folks who can afford tech" and "folks who cannot" might grow even more.
today at 7:37 AM
No, what will happen is they'll have a subscription and then also ads.
yesterday at 11:39 PM
Let's be realistic. Most of the videos on hackertube.org wouldn't exist if it weren't for the enormous sums of money YouTube pays their creators because of...ads.
I would also be more impressed with it if they created their own video processing and serving stack.
today at 12:04 AM
This is verifiably not true. The majority of the value I get from youtube aren't even by monetized videos.
today at 12:00 AM
This is just outright wrong.
The vast majority of all yt content makers do NOT pay the bills with ad rev but sponsors.
These platforms are sucking every penny they can from everyone at every step because number must go up. That is what they are suppose to do being public.
A private company like steam with a sub pay model where creators still can do sponsorship videos throwing out the attention algos would be a better product and still be plenty profitable.
Not all companies should be public and often the best are not.
yesterday at 11:02 PM
I (and millions of other people) literally had a netflix streaming subscription for 15 years (up until I cancelled it last year after 4 or 5 price hikes). The desire and ability to pay for stuff has always been there - but at the same time, there's a reason youtube has youtube content and netflix has netflix content.
today at 1:50 AM
> The desire and ability to pay for stuff has always been there - but at the same time, there's a reason youtube has youtube content and netflix has netflix content.
Funny thing is: I can subscribe to Netflix for one month a year, and watch everything that I want to watch within a week or two ... which is to say there isn't much there that interests me. With YouTube, I can typically find an hour or two of content to watch per week.
I'm not claiming that YouTube is better. It's simply a case of different people having different interests. While YouTube is almost certainly a poor option for higher budget productions, it seems to work out for lower budget productions where the producers are willing to seek out their own revenue streams.
yesterday at 11:08 PM
Netflix was easy, switching to it meant saving money for all the TV addicts.
Compare it to the widespread refusal to pay for Youtube Premium even as ads get worse there.
yesterday at 11:23 PM
My ad blocker still works on YouTube
yesterday at 11:40 PM
YouTube Premium is a terrible deal.
today at 8:46 AM
It includes YouTube Music and it removes ads. Apparently it also marks where sponsorships end in videos (though I'm not sure that is Premium only). Seems like a great deal to me.
today at 12:04 AM
yt by default is basically free with ads so the public has viewed it as “that” kind of product, mass content of vastly dif quality level.
Netflix was pay to get high quality well known product along with new high quality content.
For well over a decade they were totally different. You cannot just flip a flag and change that. It isnt people refusing to pay, it is because yt is not netflix and never will be for as long as yt is in the name.
today at 6:41 AM
today at 1:56 AM
Businesses will seek out more than one revenue source for the same product. For example: newspapers and magazines had advertising, even though the customer paid for the product. Cable television had advertising, even though people paid for cable (and cable companies paid for the channels).
It isn't going to stop data collection either. If anything, it will improve the quality of the data collected.
today at 6:08 AM
Why would you be posting other people's opinions?
yesterday at 10:16 PM
I'll definitely be taking a look, but it seems that the videos are still hosted on Youtube?
The main issue with Youtube are the ad rolls. The video content itself can be great. But I wouldn't wish those ads on my worst enemy. It's mind poison. Straight poison into your consciousness. AI generated ads for every conceivable image and status vulnerability. And they now do this weird thing where the ad is delivered as a pop song. Like a Taylor Swift engineered pop song for a Korean face mask. The song is 10 mins long about how this woman was happily married then divorced then saw her husband with a woman half his age and how that made her feel and how her self worth was tied to her marriage and her looks but also she's not just that but also somehow the solution is a Korean face mask. It was really traumatizing for me. You can see how much it infected my mind. It's poison.
yesterday at 11:02 PM
Pssst, Firefox and UBlock origin still solve that even for youtube.
today at 7:41 AM
SmartTube for your TV, NewPipe for your phone
yesterday at 11:10 PM
Thank you for giving me a glimpse. Reading half through your comment made me realize I never saw YouTube ads since the AI cancer, naturally, I wondered what it feels like.
yesterday at 10:24 PM
[flagged]
yesterday at 10:26 PM
Can you please make your substantive points thoughtfully and not cross into personal attack?
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
yesterday at 10:36 PM
I watched the entire thing to provide meta-commentary as I just did. I explicitly try not to solidify my position with knee-jerk reactions to the world. So yes I did watch the entire thing to fully qualify the poison-experience.
yesterday at 10:48 PM
What you can do is start a channel where you feature your emotional reactions to each long-form ad as it rolls on the screen. Then, you can purchase the items from the ads and explain how they totally were not the solution they promised to us. Then, having monetized your reaction/review channel, you should have enough to pay for YouTube Premium every month!
yesterday at 11:29 PM
Really? I quickly found some awful horrific racist material on "HackerTube". No thanks.
yesterday at 11:39 PM
Do you leave all platforms like that or just this one?
today at 12:13 AM
What did you find?
yesterday at 11:10 PM
I've been a bit fascinated by my lack of interest in the feeds that are curated for me. They are all things I'm supposedly interested in but I just am not when I see them in that format.
I realised after a while that one of the main reasons I go online is to expand my horizons. I'm actively looking for something new or interesting or surprising that I might not have encountered or thought about before. I am also looking for perspective - give me a broad picture of how the world is so I can calibrate and introspect where my own perspective differs and could be updated. I want to see the things that don't fully align with my ideas.
So it turns out personalised feeds are actively curating against what I'm looking for. I'm curious if others are like me or is this just something weird about me. I think it is very much why I like Hacker News format. It's in the broad areas of my interests but it is anything but curated just for me.
today at 2:32 AM
I think many experiencing the same thing but we're way too small drop of a drop in the bucket that it doesn't even resolve in all of their measurements and A/B tests. The vast majority of the "gradient signal" is from normies and their patterns, desires and tastes are different. Basically I think we see a massive deterioration of quality because we are a rounding error.
today at 8:47 AM
I can’t reject this line of thought strongly enough.
The vast majority of signal is from a plurality of opinions, and the outcome is an average of those inputs, usually tweaked a bit to make them more addictive.
Your thought that “the algorithm doesn’t serve me personally because I have exceptional taste” is not a unique observation. Everyone who consumes these systems has the same thoughts. Everyone is a rounding error, whether you’re in a knitting community, or you’re a worlds leading expert in deep learning.
today at 12:00 AM
I have the same experience, and I don't think it's just us.
I suspect what's going on is we're experiencing the long-term effects of AI recommendation algorithms getting plugged into everything. I'm not anti-AI. I think neural nets are incredibly powerful tools and I really like using them as an aide for my coding work. But they clearly do only a first or second level of pattern matching(asterisk), and I think that has a fundamental impact on their overall usefulness and desirability.
I can't explain this any better than Melanie Mitchell in her "AI for Thinking Humans," so I'd generally recommend that book to really understand the issues. But one way of thinking about it is that the AI keys in on patterns that are indeed there in its training data, but very often don't pick up on the same patterns as a human or treat patterns "not in the same way" as a person would. So you get the uncanny valley effect where the recommendations share some features of things you like and find interesting, but often miss the "soul" of the thing.
A good example of this is I recently watched the movie "X-Men" (2000). I then got a bunch of superhero movie recommendations. On the surface, this makes total sense. I watched a superhero movie, I get more superhero movies. But the reason I like that movie is it portrays racism/nationalism in a way that isn't totally stereotyped while still being PG-rated and easy to watch, without the seriousness of something like "American History X" (it was also a Patrick Stewart tribute). It's very unlikely that an AI can make that level of inference. I actually would enjoy watching more movies like that (as opposed to your point about wanting variety and something more exploratory), but what are the odds it's going to recommend some vague theme like that instead of "more superheroes"?
I also agree with your point that the underlying assumption we all want "more of the same" is a big thing that makes the modern internet feel more narrow. So you put those 2 together and it feels like we're being put into a narrow Skinner box that approximates aspects of things we like, but is really more of a confined environment designed to extract our time and attention while only fulfilling the shallowest, barest minimum of our wants and desires.
today at 5:03 AM
[flagged]
today at 7:08 AM
> Your comment sounds straight out of 2022
Please avoid swipes like this on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. HN is for curious conversation. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
today at 6:52 AM
[flagged]
today at 7:06 AM
> Why are you white-knighting for AI so hard?
Please avoid swipes like this on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
today at 4:47 AM
I just want to be the one in control of that feed that is curated towards myself. An AI that is local and learns about my likes and dislikes and does not share that info with third parties for their benefit. There is a vast sea of content and a small fraction of it is of interests to me and/or might be helpful to me even if I am not consciously seeking it at any given moment. I should be able to look at its rules, see how it evolves and tinker / reason with it the way I would with a personal assistant or life coach. And I would like to use that to filter out content that is a waste of brain cycles. And to find people, ideas, experiences that I might click with based on its global knowledge of the mindscape.
today at 7:40 AM
YouTube has a "new to you" feature which changes your homepage with different videos than your main recommendations.
today at 4:34 AM
I found the "new to you" tab on YouTube, which worked well once or twice. After those initial uses though, I couldn't get good results again
today at 1:27 AM
Youtube feeds work the other way around it appears. Content seeks you. Things promoters think you may click on haunt you. There are videos I see are there in the feed and I don't click on because I am not interested and they linger there, trying to dupe me to click on. Absolutely disgusting.
today at 9:45 AM
Youtube has music and long form videos and shorts
They should have have a section only for non entertainment stuff. I don't want to see memes, funny videos . unless im in the mood for it .. I just want things I can learn from most of the time.
today at 9:50 AM
Why do you think they care what anyone wants.
They are in the dark UX pattern world, squeezing views per second, selling ads. That's all.
The "we give our users something valuable and they will give us profit in return" approach is over since a long time.
today at 9:38 AM
This weirdly feels a lot like my own "subscription" tab.
It almost seems like we need a system where people you trust recommend interesting content, as opposed to algos thzt shove content which will produced anger / engagement / more ads revenue.
Who would have though ?
today at 9:49 AM
Apparently the easiest way to share a subscription list is by first exporting the data with google takeout.
yesterday at 9:37 PM
You know what I like about this? It's 100% pure nerd content, no sneaky influencer videos or clickbaity news.
It does need a new-to-old sort though, which is easy to add in.
If you watched all of these videos, you would be the smartest, most annoying person ever. Lol
today at 5:41 AM
It is also quite ironic that nerds of the 21st century who built social media and a hyper-connected world are simultaneously repulsed by it.
today at 8:34 AM
It was built by nerds but optimized on the data of everyone, so it ended up appealing mostly to the average person.
Maybe that's also the solution to a question I've had for years. The ads I see on diverse social platforms are terrible, but if they are matched with algorithms that try to fit me in as an average person, then it makes sense that, as a huge nerd, they miss the mark.
yesterday at 10:12 PM
> It's 100% pure nerd content
well some might use it to listen to Rick Astley's Music
today at 12:11 AM
[flagged]
today at 12:21 AM
> The rants about dishwashers and HVAC were memorable for being completely impractical advice and ignorant of economics
How you got that message from hour long rants and findings about dishwashers I'll never now.
The main take aways I got were: - You might be using way too much soap - Run your tap until it is hot before starting the dishwasher
today at 12:33 AM
It's still far cheaper, faster, and less wasteful to wash by hand. It's just that the technique required to achieve that is... controversial? It's definitely always so misrepresented you'd swear it's the "before" part of a 90s informercial shot in black and white with a frustrated idiot failing at a simple task before throwing their hands up and pleading that "there has to be a better way".
Dishwashers simply aren't used in places with water restrictions. Broke people don't have a budget for dishwashing detergent because it's less general purpose than dish soap. There are likely people who started using their dishwasher more or even suddenly bought one based on those rants. It jiggled the handle on consumer trends that otherwise rarely change, so I consider that "influence".
If he stuck to just explaining how they work instead of attacking people's way of living, it would have flown under the radar.
today at 2:22 AM
> It's still far cheaper, faster, and less wasteful to wash by hand.
Citation please? https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/20798 links 2 sources that disagree with you.
today at 2:29 AM
[dead]
today at 4:19 AM
[flagged]
today at 5:44 AM
Someone gives you sources disproving your claim and you respond by...quoting yourself calling the viewership of a video young?
Dishwashers aren't as evil as you think they are, I promise.
today at 6:09 AM
They are forced upon Americans in every way imaginable. They're bundled in with appliance sets sold to first time home buyers and preinstalled in every apartment.
You and the other comment are missing my point. It really doesn't matter at all how well they do or don't work. Dishwashers are a sales platform. The rest of the world doesn't have them.
They are neat in a way, but even TC himself admitted that the dishwasher is sort of a solution in search of a problem. His only endorsement was that they save water compared to the typical lazy bastard attempting to wash dishes by hand, and that it's a net good for that reason. I never disagreed with that. I said that TC counts as an influencer, and perhaps in the sneakiest way possible, given these replies.
Calling you all "naive" is really an understatement once the echo chamber begins reverberating. Jeez! Yes, you're part of it. I'm simply pointing it out. Yes, "citation needed" is a pseudointellectual crutch. No, you don't have to trust an influencer just because everyone else does.
today at 8:02 AM
> They're bundled in with appliance sets sold to first time home buyers and preinstalled in every apartment.
Do you object to stoves and refrigerators in the same way?
> The rest of the world doesn't have them.
This is not at all true. Source: my non-American household, which has had one for decades. (Also, web search.)
> even TC himself admitted that the dishwasher is sort of a solution in search of a problem
I don't recall him saying anything of the sort. I don't suppose you could provide a timestamp?
> Calling you all "naive" is really an understatement once the echo chamber begins reverberating. Jeez! Yes, you're part of it. I'm simply pointing it out. Yes, "citation needed" is a pseudointellectual crutch. No, you don't have to trust an influencer just because everyone else does.
It's not a matter of trust. TC presents a complete, reasoned, independently verifiable argument; and it turns out that his results replicate quite well. As per the skeptics.SE link you brushed off, and as per the personal experience of myself and many others.
At any rate, you are using inappropriate rhetoric and then disingenously trying to brush it off as "simply pointing out" claims that don't actually stand up to scrutiny.
today at 7:12 AM
Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
today at 7:30 AM
Did you mean to flag the parent comment I was replying to? These tangents rarely start with the replies. I do understand that the metadiscussion I'm bringing up is uncomfortable, though.
today at 7:41 AM
@tomhow, who you're replying to, is a HN mod - as such he rarely flags comments - flagging is a HN user action (for users with accounts of sufficient age and standing).
The mods are drawn to [flagged] comments to double check / inspect whether such a thing was warrented, if no one has made a comment as to why something was flagged they might have a guess, add that as a comment - or even reverse the flag.
If I had to guess, the comment you replied to was not flagged as it was a top level comment to be read with a generic non specific "you", however your comment was likely flagged as it appeared to some to have a judgemental tone toward another user - the "you" that you used was a specific non generic you with the comment parent as target.
FWiW I'm a rubber necking drive by user - I didn't flag your comment.
today at 7:52 AM
That makes sense. I am aware that what I'm saying would agitate a certain cohort of commenters who are used to the echo chambers of other communities. They would abuse the flag feature, and the mods on HN aren't free of bias either.
EDIT: Upon some more reflection, I can go back to my old format of posing my skepticism as questions instead of making statements. I guess the brainrot is getting to me.
today at 7:44 AM
[flagged]
today at 4:19 AM
[dead]
today at 8:59 AM
While the project is very interesting in and of itself, the process section that has been edited a bit later to the post is even more revaling:
> A little bit more on my process. I use Claude Code (desktop app for Mac). I use Opus 5.5 on Medium effort as my default. I don't actually do anything resembling traditional engineering anymore (read/write code, run commands in a terminal, or etc.), I only talk to Claude and have it do everything. In this case, the only "manual work" I did was: 1) I had to create some kind of API key from Google Cloud UI to query YouTube for video metadata, 2) I booted up a VPS box and 3) I bought the domain name. I worked on this in between Claude's actual work so it still feels a little bit like team work :) Once the box was up I gave Claude the IP and told it update, deploy, secure, harden and optimize the code, and it did the whole thing.
It really does sound like you do not need to run models like Opus 5.5 on high reasoning effort for most tasks.
yesterday at 8:39 PM
I find it amazing how close the front page of this is to what I actually watch/want to watch on YouTube. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but it feels like an unpersonalised feed (besides being based on Hacker News) shouldn't have a significantly better hitrate for me than YouTube's "personalised" feed.
yesterday at 9:13 PM
I am not sure the personalize algorithm is based on what you want to watch, but what will keep you watching. That’s a measurable KPI.
yesterday at 9:43 PM
Dumb question maybe, but aren't these two metrics supposed to be aligned? How can they keep me watching if they don't show me stuff I want to click on?
yesterday at 9:52 PM
One common trick in Shorts is for the topic of the video to not be revealed until the end, while leaving enough clues that you think the topic will be worthwhile. "So anyways, I was reverse engineering this project with Claude and I came across this little detail that I think some of you might be interested to know. This IoT product that I've got in this box right here is a smart doorbell that quacks when you step on it. But actually by holding this button for five seconds you can make it meow instead."
If you swipe away when it shows it's about an IoT doorbell you watched half, and if you swipe away after seeing the button makes it meow you watched the whole thing. In either case the algorithm thinks you liked it more than average.
In long-form videos this doesn't really work but you can use vague titles to achieve higher click rates. Taken from my actual homepage: "DON'T GIVE ME HOPE, DON'T LET ME HOPE THIS MUCH" "Did you know about these...?" "Calcium Carbide Trick" "The WORST skill to train on OSRS" "They Were Busy With Their Big Plans" "If you were trying to destroy the economy..." "What happens when we don't need each other any more?"
You know which one I'm not going to click on? "FRACTRAN: 14 fractions that produce infinite primes". That's because I already know FRACTRAN is an esoteric programming language written in fractions.
yesterday at 10:18 PM
On the one hand there's stuff you think is worthwhile to learn about, and on the other there's the dopamine brain candy that youtube throws at you along the way. They just want to keep you clicking, they don't care whether you feel good about it afterwards.
Do a good job training it and this isn't much of an issue, but give it an inch...
yesterday at 11:09 PM
It's like fast food vs healthy food.
today at 8:45 AM
This is what my dad (87) needs, filtered YouTube. He sits a lot on YouTube and often he is recommended a lot of negative World War 2 content. He is often trapped in that and although he also sees positive videos about other interesting things, depressing content gets the most attention. He has been to a geriatric doctor who also said he needs to stop watching that negative world war 2 content, since he is impacted by it.
I looked in YouTube if there is a way to filter out on key words or specific content like war, but could not find anything. YouTube Kids is a thing, but that is too restrictive.
YouTube is great for him if we could filter out stuff. This hackertube comes close. If anyone could make an app for the iPad that could filter content out by keywords that would be great.
today at 8:50 AM
Hopefully your dad wont spend much time here on this specific one. There is a disturbing amount of Joe Rogan recommended videos the VCs here love.
Also Karpathy is probably getting a take down notice by this next Monday, around 10 to 11 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)...
today at 9:39 AM
A lot of recent videos are about SpaceX IPO 'scandal'. Interesting
today at 8:30 AM
Great! We need more things like this!
Similarly, you can replace the clickbait thumbnails on Youtube with just images from the video with a Firefox extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/clickbait-rem...
today at 8:36 AM
Or also you can use the chrome extension
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/dearrow-better-titl...
The creator of this extension is the same as the creator of SponsorBlock. It's more of a crowdsourced.
yesterday at 8:41 PM
Interesting project, but have you considered publishing the curated videos as automatically maintained playlists (organized by topic, popularity, or recency) on a YouTube channel?
To me the most valuable part of this is the curation pipeline. I'd love to have access to those recommendations without needing to adopt an entirely separate viewing experience.
yesterday at 8:47 PM
I like the idea of playlists, might even work to ask Claude to make a few. Did you have in mind the ability to create and publish them on the site somehow?
yesterday at 8:56 PM
I was actually thinking of publishing them directly to YouTube, under a HackerTube channel, with playlists automatically generated and maintained by your existing curation pipeline.
yesterday at 10:33 PM
Yes please, not sure why this does not exist yet. I would even think that almost all YouTube video links from HN would make a better experience compared to the algo feed.
yesterday at 8:56 PM
Having HackerTube videos as playlists inside YT makes the video selection available on any device with YouTube app on it, like TVs etc.
yesterday at 8:48 PM
yesterday at 10:00 PM
You have no idea how big of a smile it put on my face when I saw the "Longs" option in the sidebar.
Seriously, thank you for prompting this into existence!
today at 12:03 AM
Wonderful!
> Fork it
> Everything behind this site is yours to reuse. The easiest way: give the zip to your AI agent (Claude Code or similar) and tell it what you want, such as a different interface, a weekly email of talks on your topics, a terminal browser, or an analysis. The zip includes a DATA.md written for agents: how the files fit together, the gotchas, example records, and how to walk you through getting YouTube metadata if you want it.
today at 12:50 AM
Has anyone tried to download? The download links are slightly broken (but they work if you try differently).
today at 3:28 AM
Yeah, broken if you click. Works if you copy the link into a new tab.
today at 9:07 AM
Great idea and works really well. Super easy to find interesting stuff!
If you ever add a link section to other sane video platforms, you might want to add media.ccc.de which has talks of nearly 500 hacker conferences. Also without spam.
yesterday at 8:36 PM
I wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech updates
yesterday at 8:54 PM
added a few minutes ago!
today at 12:02 AM
Why's the newest video 5 months old?
today at 1:24 AM
Even with a fresh dump, it would lag behind YouTube, since a video only gets in once someone links it on HN.
I took all the channels HN keeps recommending (3+ videos in Karpathy's data) and made a page with their fresh uploads as they come in: https://hn.youtldr.com
(I make YouTLDR, which writes the one-line answer under each video.)
today at 12:13 AM
yesterday at 8:58 PM
Don't see it.
yesterday at 9:00 PM
first do a search, then on top you'll see "Filter". might try to make more prominent from main page
yesterday at 9:04 PM
Yes, please, I couldn't figure it out as well.
yesterday at 9:39 PM
added! now can be done via Filter on the main page.
yesterday at 9:29 PM
yesterday at 9:11 PM
thanks!
yesterday at 8:49 PM
Yeah, this is the first thing I looked for and when I couldn’t find it I easily decided it’s something I would never come back to. Add this feature and it’s something I would come to frequently
yesterday at 9:39 PM
plus one when in programming mode; i have playlists on YT; but this helps to focus... and mostly I find HN has very interesting things that spawn a ton of thoughts...
people like us don't have that much time...
yesterday at 8:48 PM
Seconded! (please)
yesterday at 9:48 PM
Well, build your own in 2.1hrs (or 2 minutes if you have access to the source)
today at 8:01 AM
Gl with that.
Some time ago i build defcon.videos (down now) which basically was a similar project just full of videos from defcon conferences. Google came at me quite fast, because by their terms of service its forbidden to store a page like this if using API or automated grabbing of videos from the index (which i did logically not manually porting 100s of videos and metadata). They call in an alternate search index which is forbidden by them. Also they claim if you pull video data via their api your only to store it for limited time.
So best of luck to you
today at 8:58 AM
Yeah, worth checking the TOSes:
https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms/developer-polici...
https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms/developer-polici...
Understandable: creators often update their video metadata (title, description etc.) or make public videos back to private or unlisted, and it is in their own right to do this.
Third parties that copy data will cache stale versions even when the creator doesn't want to share them anymore. Seems fair that YouTube doesn't condone this.
yesterday at 9:05 PM
Wow, this is genuinely so good. I just browsed it for a few minutes and the difference between this and the YouTube homepage is astounding.
today at 3:36 AM
Great idea. You know, it's weird, this looks very much like my feed in 2010, in terms of quality.
I recently logged into an account that hadn't been used since then, it was like a time capsule! But within a few days it figured out who I am and started showing me manmade horrors beyond comprehension.
So it sounds to me like there's a niche for a 2010tube as well.
today at 3:16 AM
But is this compliant with Google / YouTube terms?
I have wanted to make custom YouTube wrappers for specific interests that avoid ads and distractions. There are communities like say fans of a certain music genre etc that would find the curation etc useful. But I always thought posting publicly with your name attached is a bit grey/risky.
today at 3:19 AM
The Algorithm is what YouTube sells. This is only a static collection of videos with YouTube embeds.
today at 8:44 AM
I love the idea of different ways to access YouTube. We should be able to make a website like this that is essentially a meta channel around a topic. Great work
today at 8:52 AM
Ah, I like this idea. I also had a different thought of accessing YouTube content in the sense I wanted to know all the tech live streams happening today on a particular topic.
today at 5:48 AM
Built (and still am) something like this, but hand-curated (watched end-to-end) rather than source-filtered. v0 test run: https://cabin.watch
no distribution means I'm having a bit of a hard time finding good videos fast enough (rejection rate through the roof rn), so send any if you know some.
today at 7:01 AM
Great stuff in there! Thanks for sharing.
today at 7:09 AM
Glad it landed well!
yesterday at 8:23 PM
I like this a lot. I was just thinking about a site where you could share your YouTube cookies and then use anybody's curated algorithm because you can curate it quite fast in signed out mode.
Could you block all the trackers from loading from https://www.youtube-nocookie.com on your side?
yesterday at 8:30 PM
I’m always surprised how bad YouTube’s recommendation algorithm seems to be.
Maybe it’s because I don’t watch enough videos, but it’s sort of like Amazon, in that it will suggest the exact same content/topic.
I rarely use TikTok, only to view links people send me (similar to YouTube), but the recommended content is miles ahead, making it much more difficult to close compared to YT.
yesterday at 9:29 PM
My YouTube feed is pretty good; it's full of technical discourse on topics that I enjoy learning about, ranging from electronics hacking to civil engineering. That's probably the result of a long number of years of continuous training:
Good video, with a positive combination of presentation quality and a topic I enjoy? Watch it -- maybe now or later, but it gets watched. Thumbs up. Maybe even subscribe. That's what I'm there for.
Mediocre video, whether due to content or presentation? Watch parts of it, but probably not with any sense of completeness. No rating.
Bad video, with content I don't enjoy or with off-putting presentation? Stop watching. Thumbs down, and/or back out to use three-dot menu and "Not interested"
Bad ragebait scaremongering video with emotionally-distressing title? No watching at all. Three-dot menu and "Don't recommend this channel."
---
I get a lot of good stuff. Some mediocre stuff. Very little bad stuff. Almost zero ragebait.
It works well enough that an unfiltered, logged-out view of YouTube is completely and utterly appalling by comparison. That place is fucking awful without training.
(And no ads, because ads have never been a thing for me on YouTube and I experience no compulsion to change that.)
yesterday at 10:38 PM
I think that most people make little use of the negative feedback options, mainly because they are more clicks away (dark patterns). A addon that gives them a button next to the thums up could help.
yesterday at 11:15 PM
Yeah, perhaps I'm more-willing to put effort into it than some others are and making it easier would help us all out.
I do wonder if the relative inaccessibility of negative feedback paths is due to malfeasance/dark patterns/whatever or just stupidity, though.
If the purpose of YouTube is to show ads to people (it is), then that means maximizing viewership. In this way, it doesn't really matter what people are watching as long as they're actually watching it. More hours of streaming consumption = more hours of ads viewed, and the clock doesn't care if it's positive and enjoyable content or rage-inducing clickbait.
So with meaningful feedback, the good stuff should be able to float up to the top. That would gain viewers, which gains ad placements, which gains money. Everyone wins.
---
Unless, of course, I'm wrong about society. Maybe the majority of potential viewers really do enjoy sitting around and being angry and/or fearful, and find some kind of emotional reward by being incensed.
And clearly, some are: Switching on an AM radio in Anywhere, USA demonstrates this well (the vitriol is off the charts).
I'm just not willing to accept that this represents most people, at least not just yet.
(But if that is an accurate portrayal of the state of things, then: Ragebait means more viewers and more dollars. And thereby, there can be no hope for the platform ever recovering at all. If it pays more to get worse, then it shall simply become worse.)
yesterday at 8:32 PM
Do you have web activity turned off or use a separate old style Youtube account? Mine is also bad but I think it's because of those for me.
yesterday at 8:35 PM
I was thinking it would be good if there was something similar for kids. They seem to fall into a whirlpool of trash content.
today at 4:09 AM
The Kid Should See This is basically exactly that. Highly recommended.
yesterday at 8:37 PM
For YouTube nerds I curate a list of channels. Size of list 3993 feeds: - https://github.com/rumca-js/awesome-database-top/blob/main/l...
From that list 731 are blocked in my rss feed. I do read and cache rest.
I sometimes check through website what new has entered the system. It is surprising to see something there new. It is so exiting to see something outside of my bubble.
YouTube algorithm has a lot to comb through, but I am too surprised how suggestion are bland, and unattractive. I am also surprised how difficult is to find new channels through YouTube search.
yesterday at 8:34 PM
I suspect they know perfectly well when they can't make money from someone, so they deliberately serve up boring crap to save on hosting costs.
today at 12:17 AM
>Maybe it’s because I don’t watch enough videos, but it’s sort of like Amazon, in that it will suggest the exact same content/topic.
I've got years of history and it does the exact same thing for me. I watched one news video about the pope and now half of my feed is Catholic news channels.
I buy a mattress on Amazon and I get recommendations for... ten other mattresses? Like what's the logic here, I have an entire garage where I just keep stacking them up to the ceiling? Just show me something else. Is there a human being out there whose like "I bought a French press last week, what could I need this week, five more French Presses?"
I do not understand how these dystopian surveillance companies with their infinite data points are so bad even at this
yesterday at 8:35 PM
Bad by what metric? They're interested in getting you to watch ads, they couldn't care less what you want.
today at 3:11 AM
Youtube sometimes displays an 'Ask AI' button under the video. I recently searched 'Pride of America' (the cruise ship) and the top result was interesting but alarmist/clickbaity, along the lines of 'Don't make these 7 mistakes'. 'Ask AI' let me ask "what are the 7 mistakes": it told me, and in 10 seconds I could deem that video a waste of time. Very efficient.
Overall this 'Ask AI' button is going to smash content creators who rely on clickbait. As a user, it greatly improves my ability to skip bad/clickbaity content, which I really appreciate.
yesterday at 10:47 PM
> push to a VPS, secure, harden, optimize
In my opinion this is the part that's holding back _a lot_ more people from publishing. It's a barrier that's surely about to fall. Still interested what steps you took (and manually, or Claude did it all?)
yesterday at 11:15 PM
I didn’t touch anything manually I only talked to Claude the whole project, except for YouTube API key, domain, its DNS record and VPS node boot.
yesterday at 11:30 PM
Curious about the hardening and optimizing - how much extra prompting is spent to ensure a ‘clean’ software supply chain for this, versus having Claude at its own discretion use third-party packages/libraries/etc (or not)?
today at 2:50 AM
Sometimes I say something like "check recent cyber stuff" and it dispatches a few subagents and does the thing.
today at 3:05 AM
Wow, I'm definitely overthinking and overprompting then. Seems like driving this process can benefit from a more laidback approach. Thanks!
today at 5:01 AM
Only with Opus 5.5+. The thing is beast mode. I wouldn’t trust other weaker models this much.
yesterday at 10:59 PM
would love to see a write up on this too. my own tech experience has been all back end stuff and doing everything myself, so tying into "the way things are done online" aint so easy. and my patience for reading 3-4 books on it is close to zero.
yesterday at 11:18 PM
I’ll add a bit more to the post when I get back from trick or treating
yesterday at 11:33 PM
Thanks Andrej, look forward to it.
yesterday at 10:57 PM
> Buy a VPS, publish to it, buy a domain and link it, then keep paying for both in perpetuity.
I've always been put off by the continuing financial obligations personally. Like I'll invest a considerable amount for one time things easily, but year after year with constantly increasing costs? No fuckin way.
yesterday at 11:08 PM
I rented a hetzner server years ago and have steadily grown into it. No increasing costs so far.
yesterday at 9:14 PM
What a smart idea!
Just randomly found this video from CGP Grey:
"What Happened to Horses Is Happening to Us"
https://hackertube.org/watch/7Pq-S557XQU
From...2014 It's surprisingly accurate. I wonder why he stopped making youtube videos.
yesterday at 10:14 PM
> I wonder why he stopped making youtube videos.
I've listened to plenty of podcast episodes with CGP Grey and he wasn't secretive about the fact that he does not really enjoy work that much. He also maintained that once he quits he won't make any announcements, but rather just silently disappear.
I assume he has decided that he has enough money and retired.
He (or someone else) is still changing the old video titles and thumbnails to optimise views, though. This particular video used to be called Humans need not apply.
yesterday at 9:21 PM
His last video was ~1 year ago which by the standards of late career youtubers isn't that long ago.
Hbomberguy's last video was 3 years ago for instance.
yesterday at 9:21 PM
I don’t like that he keeps renaming it. This is “Humans Need Not Apply” and it even has its own Wikipedia page under that name!
And yes it’s deeply true. I remember watching this at the time and it was one of the reasons I got into AI. (That, and watching Person of Interest).
I even kept re-linking it every year around Christmas, watching it on a yearly basis. And then …
today at 5:38 AM
One feature I really like about this is how you've included a (presumably LLM generated?) summary of what Hacker News recommended a video, and then the actual comments recommending it. Nice to be able to see why a video is there and what people like about it.
today at 7:05 AM
Yes this would be great. Otherwise it might contain videos with fake news, which were rebutted in the HN comments but you’d never know.
today at 7:09 AM
It has the feature already! I just wanted to say how much I like it.
yesterday at 10:29 PM
I attempted something similar a few months ago, but specifically for documentaries after I found two amazing documentaries in the comments sections (the Disney living characters one [1] and the Mars rover engineer one [2]).
I mostly used some basic string matching to pull out documentaries and put them in a spreadsheet [3]. I sorted them by random and was going through one a day, but the results weren’t great so I stopped.
I should give it another go with a more hands-off fully vibe-coded approach.
- [1] https://youtu.be/NyIgV84fudM?is=PTwtQ9v0sxQ1eCYl
- [2] https://youtu.be/QKSPk_0N4Jc?is=YGgIRFCpFpMbddu7
- [3] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uoZiAe5qHGIyUTsqFPLG...
yesterday at 8:54 PM
Out of curiosity - was this created using claude code? Cli or gui? I am not even remotely getting that kind of thoroughness from claude with opus 5.5 or anything really. It seems to want to stop as soon as it thinks it figured things out and then the rest of the conversation is just itself saying that its previous claims were wrong.
Really having a bad time with LLMs lately.
today at 3:05 AM
I'm not sure I follow, what is it exactly that your bots can't do? This is a relatively simple project implementation wise, since it only has to serve static content. LLMs are also OK at manually sifting through text passages to classify them semantically, if you ask them to.
today at 4:17 AM
> Opus downloaded all comments of HackerNews, filtered them, ran Sonnet over them in a Workflow (Claude Code feature), got rid of spam, and narrowed everything down to 40K comments recommending a YouTube video.
This part. And Andrej even mentioned he uses medium! I wonder what went into the prompt that prompted the agent to dig deep. Mine seems to stop at very mediocre results fairly consistently and then I just reprompt it a couple of times and it does some back and forth contradicting itself.
I have projects and I made real apps using only LLMs, but it feels tedious. Definitely not a 2 hour thing. And definitely not magical and smooth sadly :(
today at 4:51 AM
Well, not sure what I can add here, because this is exactly the type of semantic classification that I expect LLMs to do well, and can't really say why your agents failed to do it.
I've done similar work simply by giving a model a database of text, and asking it to do a unit of work for every passage. "Checking for spam" would be the model checking surrounding messages and user's history, likely an opinionated verdict, but would work. Difficulty comes in when those units of work become complex or have to work in tandem, which isn't the case here.
yesterday at 9:09 PM
Claude Code, I found it in About
> HackerTube was built by Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic's AI model, working in Claude Code: the data pipeline, the search and recommendations, and this site.
yesterday at 9:28 PM
Perhaps try telling it you're Andrej Karpathy and then see how much it wants to impress you?
yesterday at 8:59 PM
I haven't used CC in a while, but I would bet this is sol that made this.
however I still get the same issues with sol getting more apologetic and is more likely to stop working when i tell it is wrong, instead of fixing course and trudging ahead.
yesterday at 9:02 PM
In the first paragraph Karpathy says he used Opus 5.5. The parent comment is asking if he used a different harness besides claude code.
yesterday at 8:39 PM
This is such a good use of tech! Although I have heard in the past that youtube is quick to ban any use of its content on a third party site. I hope I am wrong and this stays.
today at 3:15 AM
its not copying the content, its just a recommender system that links to the video stored on youtube.
yesterday at 9:29 PM
Gosh, the videos HN have recommended are amazing. What a community this is.
yesterday at 11:28 PM
This prompted me to finish HackerNewsTV – YouTube playlist of latest HN videos, updated daily:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50321248
yesterday at 11:37 PM
It seems that even HN can't avoid linking the clickbaity titles.
yesterday at 11:51 PM
Everyone has praised it already, so I won't be original, but I have to say that I've been looking for something like this for quite a while now. I consume a lot of long form videos on yt, similar to what you can find in your feed, but somehow yt keeps boxing me into very narrow space after a while with same videos over and over again. I've been trying to escape this trap by creating new accounts but eventually I keep finding myself in the same box.
Definitely something worth exploring.
yesterday at 11:05 PM
I was thinking earlier how the comments or annotations could be implemented in the right way, to fix the problems with the Youtube's comments system. It is certainly not trivial, and one can argue whether this is even desirable. But it would be cool to be able to reference parts of different videos and other resources more fluently.
For example, Kurzgesagt channel prepares their mini-lecture videos very carefully, and they often have a document on their site, referenced in the description under the video, and which annotates the video, and justifies the choices they made in how to present things. The document gives quotes and references to academic sources. If one could navigate and update narratives like that, sort of like a wiki, with one-click references to the relevant snippets of the video, maybe that would work. But even for their videos, the comments section in Youtube is largely useless.
World wide web was unleashed by putting together in a seamless way a few things which were already common before it. One click hypertext navigation was already a standard thing for the technical manuals locally on PC. But making it work on-line, instead of typing several strings in command line made all the difference. Maybe today we could tweak the commenting system to make the comments much more convenient to navigate than they are today. Keep similar comments from multiplying unnecessarily. Allow finding and linking relevant information. I do not have a thought out solution, but there is definitely some room for innovation here, if one approached it imaginatively.
today at 5:39 AM
Hey Andrej,
thanks for putting this site together, it's awesome! Even more so is might be your process. Can add some color about your prompts and how you direct the work. I find myself taking much longer for different but comparable types of work and would love to learn a bit about how you direct the model. I use Astra but hope there is some transferable bits here.
today at 6:11 AM
My prompts are getting shorter and dumber because the model "gets" what I'm doing even with fewer words. It's almost to the point where if you give it too much, you're constraining the model with too many requirements, when the thing it would have done otherwise was better/smarter. So I feel like the prompting meta is moving more towards fewer bits administered just right. I go back and forth on whether I should make a video on it because on the one hand people have these questions but on the other my best practices look so dumb it's almost embarassing.
today at 8:52 AM
don't think of your video as the "best way to do it", we'd love a video of how you specifically go through these things rather than a hyper-optimized way to go about it. it may be true that the next guy in here has a much more advanced process, but it surely doesn't hurt seeing someone with a 'bit of history' on the matter jump-n-run their way through small projects like this. I believe it would bring some comfort to those who feel like they're a thousand years behind already.
today at 9:15 AM
Wrote about similar observations few days back. Bespoke AI prompt, harness and context engineering seem obsolete after few months
https://jakobbr.eu/2026/10/14/hot-take-ai-skills-already-get...
today at 7:41 AM
Make youtube for hackers, that does not suck, or you're going to jail.
yesterday at 9:04 PM
You may want to change the logo, it is a different color but close enough to cause confusion. Not sure what a trademark court would say but it would definitely be enough to draw intimidation from Google if they wanted to.
yesterday at 9:12 PM
ty i think this is right
yesterday at 8:49 PM
Nitpick, maybe adding the youtube dislike counter estimation for videos might be a nice touch (yes it's an estimate but it's pretty decent). Though on second thought, perhaps these videos don't need them.
yesterday at 8:53 PM
Someone did something similar for the current front page: https://hn.video
There was also another one with a more youtube-like UI, which I can't find anymore.
today at 12:12 AM
Kudos to Andrej for another demonstration of frontier vibe engineering (since MenuGen). Looking forward to the new recommendation model.
today at 4:48 AM
Andrej this is pretty awesome. Encompasses the need for all of us devs (junior through leads) to continue learning, while embodying what our current reality looks like in the development of the site itself.
Will say tho, your videos themselves have been the biggest help so far, so I would rather see more of those in the future. But I'll take this as a consolation :)
today at 1:00 AM
I created a new YouTube account that turn of history and that's my default. If I want to watch something I have to type and search, there is no recommendation and it's been great so far. Sharing this as I think someone might not know about this and they might find it interesting.
today at 1:15 AM
I also found turning off history and heavily pruning subcribed channels was the only way to fix youtube sloppification; particularly avoiding shorts being heavily forced by google
today at 2:08 AM
Its so refreshing to see the GUI. especially, since most of these videos are handpicked(?!) by users as suggestions and not originally intended to swim on the ratrace! AdBlockers helps you w/ UI distractions but the continious sloppy videos equipped q/ faulty thumbnails was/is my biggest distraction so far and thats what picked my attention on this fresh take.
I believe YT clients is inevitable (not just UI but something similar to this) similar to RES[1] happened for reddit!
[1] https://redditenhancementsuite.com/
today at 5:07 AM
YouTube is at high risk at the moment, because both sides of the marketplace hate it. The best creators are just as frustrated as users like Karpathy by the current state of things. I predict a subscription-based, properly moderated alternative may gain critical mass soon.
yesterday at 9:38 PM
This is very cool. I’ve been thinking a lot recently about owning your algorithms and what rss could have been.
Is there a file / feed of the data driving this?
today at 8:01 AM
This is great. I wish the same existed for conference and meetup talks!
yesterday at 8:20 PM
How many tokens (or $) does something like this take to make?
yesterday at 8:26 PM
I'm on subscription but I had Claude add it up: 504M input tokens (90% cached), 7.6M output tokens. 90+% of that was Sonnet calls to label the comments, all of the actual work, the app and deploy etc was ~1M tokens of Opus 5.5, I compacted context once. i.e. very small project by modern standards.
yesterday at 8:42 PM
I wish someone would make a decision model that’s as good as sonnet but like 10-100x cheaper. Because for this project which is a pretty small dataset you’re spending ~$300 on sonnet usage. like jev can probably do this task but it’s not smart enough to reliably be used
yesterday at 9:10 PM
GLM 5.3 Flash is incredibly cheap and imho as good as or better than Sonnet. I used it recently to fix an old server that my family had running serving some websites, and by fix it I mean I got it to log in over ssh, figure out what's running there, copy it out, log in to a brand new droplet on DO, set up a fresh instance of apache with everything patched up to latest, copy that ancient content over, make sure it runs with latest PHP which required several rounds of fixes, optimize the system so it runs on the smallest 512MB droplet, harden the system so that ideally no one ever needs to look at it for another 10 years - it took about an hour, and cost a grand total of 4 american.... _cents_
I use Opus at work since we have a nearly unlimited AI budget, but for personal projects I just use GLM 5.3 and I don't see much difference between that and Opus.
today at 1:05 AM
GLM is really good, but sonnet outclasses it. Anthropic really cooked with sonnet 5+
yesterday at 8:31 PM
Yeah i'm pretty sure this is doable multiple times on a 20 dollar subscription, just wow
yesterday at 9:51 PM
So it's unknowable how much it cost?
yesterday at 9:57 PM
It'd cost ~$250 via API (ie. paying current API pricing per token).
Source: copy pasted the tokens into a chatbot and told it to figure it out.
yesterday at 10:01 PM
But hardly anybody pays API pricing and this was made with a sub..
yesterday at 10:08 PM
So the cost was zero.
today at 2:09 AM
Uh, with some fancy accounting..
I think most people could consider the cost as being whatever percentage of the subscription quota was used multiplied by the cost of the subscription.
yesterday at 8:38 PM
I pay for YT premium but noticed the quality of recommendations is subpar yet I still end up wasting time watching it. So I decided I need to limit my feed to my subscribed videos only, which YT app makes annoyingly difficult.
How does HN handle this? I suppose downloading videos for consuming outside YT own app works, but what's the best solution for this, especially with Apple TV as a player?
yesterday at 9:16 PM
Personnaly I disabled recommendations/watch history/etc... so the youtube homepage is blank, there is absolutely nothing on it.
I first started by moving all my subscriptions to grayjay(where I also disabled the home page), that way I just click the subscriptions tab and there is everything there, you can even create subscription groups if needed.
Then as I had some issues with grayjay desktop(not the mobile app which works great) I then simply moved all my subscriptions to miniflux and newsrafts(which I now rarely use). I use feedflow on android and reminiflux on desktop as I don't like the miniflux frontend. So now if there is a new channel I want to follow I just add the channel rss feed to miniflux/newsraft.
So for apple tv I guess you could use a RSS app but I am not sure the user experience would be great, so using grayjay could be an option as you can stream the video to the TV's but that would require another device (phone/computer) as it's not available on ios/apple tv.
I guess a good starting point would be to simply disable everything in your youtube settings to start off (watch history, recommandations, etc...).
today at 12:33 AM
Thanks, much appreciated!
yesterday at 8:41 PM
I have an extension that blocks all recommendations and forces me to subscribe to the creators I like and search for content myself. Recommendations aren’t optimized for your benefit. Cutting out the recommendations really helps to not get sucked in.
yesterday at 10:48 PM
What's the add-ons name?
today at 1:52 AM
Focused Youtube
yesterday at 8:39 PM
YouTube constantly cycles the same content + videos it’s so annoying
yesterday at 8:39 PM
Recency sort needs a pick between comment date and upload date, since a 2012 talk linked last month is exactly the gem you'd want.
yesterday at 8:32 PM
Nice idea, thanks Andrej! When will you add HackerTube Shorts? (kidding :D)
yesterday at 8:57 PM
NEVER. More inclined to add HackerTube Longs :D
yesterday at 9:05 PM
You can make the ultimate anti-short attention span player by intercepting all keyboard/mouse inputs to prevent navigating away and requiring you to watch the whole video ◡.
yesterday at 9:08 PM
You haven't posted on YouTube in a year or so. Working on any long-form videos we can expect to see anytime soon?
Anyway, loved your "GPT from scratch" video btw!
yesterday at 8:59 PM
yes! I'd love that :D
yesterday at 10:41 PM
Is it right that there haven't been any interesting or good videos for the past 5 months? I filtered by “upload date,” and the most recent videos are from 5 months ago. Still, I like it. Is it open source? I'd like to know what kind of tech stack was used here.
yesterday at 10:52 PM
Could it be that the huggingface export mentioned at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50320784 is out of date?
yesterday at 10:43 PM
lol no good content has been created since 5 months humans have lost all creativity
today at 8:25 AM
This is cool and all, but what I see is an Anthropic model harvesting (again) human output and curation. That is the part providing almost the entire value of this aggregation wrapper. What I would have preferred to see the model undertake: is somehow imbibe the median Hacker News user persona (if there is one, the reccs did serve as a proxy for that in this case) and work with YouTube API to surface a list of videos with low viewership or traction, but serve the custom taste of this audience at high SNR. I know talk is cheap, but the latter to me is a bicycle and sewing machine, while the former a neatly raked sandpile.
today at 9:17 AM
Would you be willing to share the code base of this site (sans videos list)? I know a person with a list of approx. 4500 curated youtube video links they've been maintaining for an entirely non-HN related purpose that would like to build a similar site and populate it with the video URLs. Right now it's in a much more clunky, awkward format.
today at 12:53 AM
What makes this so good is not the curation it’s the age in which confirms our current views after years of bad information. The truth is setting us free and this confirms much
today at 6:42 AM
I just noticed it is a vibe-coded project by Karpathy
It'd be awesome if he writes something about he he vibe-coded it
yesterday at 10:09 PM
Not sure how but adding a live up to date version of https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=youtube.com would be nice to see in channel form, I don't think this matches recently recommended (unless based on # of upvotes) - still thank you for putting this curation together.
yesterday at 10:10 PM
I've been wanting to make that work for a long time! Assuming I understand you correctly: for HN to segment youtube domains so they show as youtube/channel the way github/username, twitter/username, etc., do.
I think I got stuck on needing some account to access the API that will tell you the channel name.
today at 7:24 AM
I thought they meant turning that page into a YouTube-like view (being able to filter by channel would also be very cool, though), I was going to do something similar in my own HN extension, but after trying an initial lazy embedding approach [1], asking for declarativeNetRequestWithHostAccess to be able to bypass HN's Content-Security-Policy feels icky.
Having https://i.ytimg.com in img-src (for thumbnails) and https://www.youtube-nocookie.com in frame-src (for embeds) would be nice :)
Edit: you can use YouTube's oembed endpoint to get channel details for a video, e.g.:
https://www.youtube.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube...
[1] https://imgur.com/a/hacker-newstube-g1BQ7lf
yesterday at 10:46 PM
Very nice, I've had great experience using hn to recommend, more like a feed though: https://xiliary.com/bck/hn-tv.html
today at 4:01 AM
I recently built my own feed. On an Android phone, you can have an AI agent SSH in and make changes to it if you're rooted. I replaced the feed on my home screen with links my AI thinks I'd find interesting - it's pretty good!
today at 5:04 AM
This is a great concept, but I want to see more recent videos. Not videos uploaded 6-9 months ago. It would be great to be able to filter for videos uploaded in the last month.
yesterday at 8:42 PM
Really cool idea, you might consider bundling taps when you click a video so it auto-plays instead of opening up the native web browser for youtube. That would make it feel more like the official client. Could easily hide it behind a “buffering” screen.
yesterday at 10:20 PM
that's really cool, I don't know if it's possible to add `Return YouTube Dislike` integration to shows the dislike counts. API (OSS): https://returnyoutubedislike.com/docs
and this one might be tricky but SponsorBlock integration also? to auto-skips sponsor segments and introsusing crowdsourced timestamps. API: https://wiki.sponsor.ajay.app/w/API_Docs
yesterday at 10:31 PM
With the new wave of ads on mobile, the ones with the "next" button, I gave up. Instead I use the app to find videos and copy them to pipepipe.
Maybe the curated list can be exported to load on other apps.
today at 3:31 AM
I’ve had the UnTrap for YouTube extension installed for a while to remove all the shorts, feeds and algorithmic content and my YouTube consumption has gone down by like 90%. Feels so much better not consuming all that mental junk
yesterday at 8:22 PM
Nice idea will watch though some - I made something similar but for food vids (filters over YouTube chefs - such as only vids with ingredients)
https://mealplannr.io/discover
today at 1:24 AM
Great work!
I’d like to add one more thing, 3Blue1Brown has created a well-organized archive of YouTube channels launched during all the 3Blue1Brown Math Exposition Contests from 2021 to 2026. There are a lot of great YouTube channels worth checking out!
today at 4:02 AM
This is a nick interest site, a video version of harkernews. I am surprised to see videos from many years ago which surely never be seen in YouTube due to too many contents rendered by algorithms
today at 2:15 AM
AI companies sell tokens to produce slops. Then they sell more tokens to shield people from those slops.
yesterday at 9:24 PM
Very interesting. I find that my youtube feed is nicely curated to my interests. Adapting my interests with the algo well. Discovery is mostly en pointe. It is only when I use an unlogged-in browser that I see the world outside the Matrix. That is a slopfest indeed.
What I would really like, now that you have opened up this amazing concept, is an ability to feed my own algo this entire collection. Inject all those videos into my own saved playlist. That would be anotherr cool use of this collection. Is there a way of doing that? Like some sort of algo plant food.
yesterday at 9:59 PM
What do you usually do to fine tune your algorithm? Mine always seems to corrupt after some time even if I like and subscribe to specific channels. I have to delete all my history once a year or so.
today at 12:30 AM
Hehe, longs. I'd love to see this iterated on to keep adding new content that's in line with this kind of thing!
today at 6:14 AM
OMG, thank you. Though this might cut into my sleep a bit, it's welcome anyway.
yesterday at 10:59 PM
I actually do like it a lot.
Small bug report: on mobile layout, the like/dislike button is getting a bit clipped and the watch later button seems a bit off too.
today at 6:54 AM
It's asking to login to YT to prove I'm not a bot!
yesterday at 8:33 PM
This is great, would love filters for duration and sort by upload date
yesterday at 8:39 PM
Sorting would certainly be great. I'd especially welcome sorting by some kind of quality metric. The "thumbs down" count is not available via API anymore, but you could use thumbs up per views as a proxy, although that might require some reweighing, since videos with many views usually have fewer thumbs up.
You could also add another layer of voting on hackertube.org, so you'd get a more hackernews-focused voting signal.
yesterday at 8:49 PM
added and pushed!
yesterday at 9:39 PM
would be nice to be able to filter by hackernews upvotes on the recommending post
edit: and have the filter persist while navigating between topics
yesterday at 10:07 PM
Holy shit, an actual AI celeb replied to my comment and did a thing! Thank you kind sir
today at 6:33 AM
today at 7:45 AM
Thank you Andrej, this is awesome!
yesterday at 8:25 PM
What a great idea. Does anyone know of a way of 'getting' / downloading all those URLs (maybe with the video title)..? I'm afraid of the site disappearing.
yesterday at 8:27 PM
The site won't disappear (imminently, as I'd like to use it personally!) but head over to the about/ section and download the .zip with the underlying data, which I put up for this purpose.
today at 12:42 AM
One thing worth exploring would be how the recommendations compare to YouTube's algorithm. Hacker News upvotes and discussion history provide a different signal for what people find interesting, but I wonder how well that translates into video recommendations.
yesterday at 9:55 PM
Wait a second, forget the content, is the html/tech behind this actually more pleasant to use than googles hyperoptimized youtube website?
today at 4:36 AM
For those who live alone, how many of you watch YouTube while eating at home?
If you watch or do something else while eating, what is it?
today at 4:38 AM
I always do!
today at 4:49 AM
I don’t live alone, but I mostly watch YouTube on the TV. As I don’t eat at my desk (where I spend a lot of time), I usually go on youtube and try to find a nice recommendation or a new video from my interests. But my ipad and my ereader are always near in case I don’t find anything interesting (often these days). I’ve plenty of things in flight to read and HN is always a backup option.
yesterday at 8:39 PM
Do you plan to update the site with new videos and comments?
today at 5:17 AM
HackerTube feels like putting VR goggles on for the first time. Surreal in many ways.
yesterday at 10:15 PM
At this point everything looks boring and possible (technically). I wonder what would change this.
yesterday at 10:19 PM
today at 4:22 AM
really nice, set up an adaption of this for myself with a few more art, culture, movie-making sources added.
https://endtime-instruments.org/zentube/
yesterday at 10:24 PM
Oh how I wish there was an Apple TV app for this. I do all my YouTube browsing on an Apple TV.
today at 4:10 AM
Making a tvOS app of this, in the coming week. Will share the code on GH.
today at 1:33 AM
yesterday at 9:21 PM
today at 3:33 AM
>sourced from 39,834 HN comments since 2007.
Is that all of them? That's a lower number than I was expecting!
yesterday at 10:28 PM
Funny, this user made exactly this a year ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43672050
Only 12 upvotes - I guess his name wasn’t Karpathy.
today at 1:58 AM
I actually love it. Thanks for finding it and sharing it here!
today at 3:07 AM
Awesome. Using this instead
yesterday at 10:39 PM
Maybe the UI put people off? idk because this seems cool as well.
yesterday at 10:48 PM
[flagged]
today at 6:59 AM
You’re not wrong, sometimes even a tweet by these people will be front page
yesterday at 8:38 PM
I currently use downloaded and curated youtube videos on my local server ( mostly for my kid so that I don't have to deal with youtube autoplay or her clicking something kid would ), but this is just a reminder of much google has changed for the worse.
today at 2:45 AM
It's so cool to browse youtube like this again, So many cool recommendations, a much needed project
yesterday at 10:24 PM
Oh, oh no.
I already have about 35 tabs open of YT to watch.
This is going to kill my productivity.
Still, great stuff thank you!
yesterday at 8:50 PM
yesterday at 9:30 PM
No login/account? What a blasphemy. Feel in love from the first site.
yesterday at 10:05 PM
HackerTube Plus is only $5.99/mo. Among other amazing features it includes our new AI Amanda! You can connect Amanda to your Google account and get personalized recommendations.
yesterday at 11:15 PM
It makes me want to login in, to share the history and recommendations between screens. I think a neat way to do that would be to authenticate with some other service that can just store and sync an encrypted blob that is the Local Storage of the site. That could be fairly private and doesn't put any load on the first site, it wouldn't need accounts. This could be a browser feature but then it doesn't work between browsers.
yesterday at 9:28 PM
It might be neat to integrate DeArrow to fetch thumbnails instead of just arbitrarily picking picking a 50% screenshot. It could also be used to replace the titles on the server side.
yesterday at 8:36 PM
How do the categories work? I'd download the video transcripts and embed the text (maybe summarized first). This way you could support custom categories via embedding similarity.
yesterday at 11:01 PM
Amazing! If only it would appear on my AppleTV...
yesterday at 8:49 PM
What is a 50% thumbnail?
yesterday at 8:51 PM
I'd never heard this term either, but I'm assuming it means that if the video is N frames long, it uses frame N/2 as the thumbnail.
yesterday at 8:59 PM
correct. it means the thumbnail is sourced from exactly halfway in the video, so you get a representative frame.
yesterday at 9:05 PM
The average thumbnail on YouTube these days is some guy looking like HOLY SHIT, tearing his hair in amazement looking at something with an arrow pointing at some detail. "TOP 10 XYZ. YOU'LL NEVER BELIEVE #6". Like and subscribe. Utterly repulsive.
yesterday at 9:40 PM
i'd prefer to see the original thumbnail though so that i can recognize the video if i have seen it on youtube already. i also expect that the kind of videos that tend to be recommended on HN are less prone to have clickbait thumbnails.
yesterday at 10:13 PM
configurable in the Settings! (see the menu on the left banner)
today at 3:49 AM
this is amazing. I just pause and clear my youtube history so that i don't see any rubbish and just search what i want. but this is just great.
yesterday at 10:05 PM
I like this. All the "influencers" gone.
yesterday at 10:47 PM
Is there a list of influencers and a nice way to automatically block them?
today at 6:38 AM
This looks brilliant!
today at 12:58 AM
yesterday at 9:29 PM
It would be nice to have some context for each video, a summary of the comments that recommended it in the thumbnail tooltip?
today at 12:43 AM
yesterday at 11:32 PM
It would be great if this could be keyboard navigable, using arrow keys and enter to play.
yesterday at 10:54 PM
Feedback: On mobile, swipe back from video jumps back to top of feed with different video order.
yesterday at 8:31 PM
Some of the Alan Kay lectures are on hackertube
today at 12:00 AM
Nice. This is excessively large so it probably took a while to curate. Well done
today at 12:21 AM
Hey Andrej, thanks for the effort. It's highly appreciated!
In your video regarding your own use of LLMs[1] you mention https://arena.ai/leaderboard and https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard to keep track of the status quo. That video is from February 2025 and https://artificialanalysis.ai has gained quite a lot of popularity but also earned criticism repeatedly due to updating the benchmarks right before a new model release. Would you still recommend the arena and scale leaderboards? And if you don't mind, what's your opinion wrt artificialanalysis?
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
today at 3:01 AM
No i don't recommend those anymore. Currently I recommend Epoch's ECI. AA was kind of bad but recent changes are trending a little bit better. I think benchmarks are in a really bad state right now otherwise, I basically don't trust them, good related reading https://epoch.ai/data/benchmark-reviews-documentation/includ...
yesterday at 8:38 PM
yesterday at 8:42 PM
It would be great to have an option to sort videos by upload date, so it's easier to discover recent content.
today at 7:27 AM
I wish youtube had an api with an upload date filter for all videos. One could then build a pre-ai youtube.
today at 1:06 AM
YouTube itself needs a competitor. There's too much ads.
yesterday at 9:51 PM
Would love to see the list of submissions and comments that positively contributed to this.
yesterday at 8:42 PM
Interesting idea! Also funny that the fourth recommendation for me was a video with Andrej himself :D
today at 3:18 AM
this looks great and I love how snappy it is.. Youtube feels so slow compared to this
yesterday at 8:47 PM
Seeing Prejudice by Tim Minchin on the front page makes me very, very happy.
Love Tim Minchin <3
today at 4:10 AM
Tired of low-effort YouTube clickbait slop? Just click on the Subscriptions heading to go to https://www.youtube.com/feed/subscriptions. You'll see only videos from the creators you have subscribed to. This one-click trick boosts the signal-to-noise ratio dramatically.
today at 1:44 AM
Kind of related, I extracted opinions on products and other things for large part of Reddit and HN:
https://www.trustmebro.reviews/r/hackernews
"47,699 products, places and tools ranked from 13,576,547 opinions."
Opinions extracted using local models running on 3090s in my basement. If someone wants to take it over, you can mail me.
The travel opinions on a map are pretty neat: https://www.trustmebro.reviews/c/travel?view=map
today at 1:46 AM
I love that this perfectly highlights all the HN astroturfing.
today at 6:33 AM
>I'm sure this algorithm works well for the median person on the internet, but it definitely does not work for me.
This is hilariously rich coming from the "I can't watch any movie from before the 90s because it's too boring" guy
today at 2:49 AM
I'm sad that there seems to be no RSS feed. It looks very nice indeed if I can remember to look.
today at 2:54 AM
Karpathy is such a legend.
today at 6:16 AM
Love it
yesterday at 10:23 PM
Can i plz has rss
today at 12:24 AM
cool! It would be nice to have a "watch a random video" button
today at 6:34 AM
Cool idea. Glad others are on the same page regarding the enshittification of YouTube content!
yesterday at 9:02 PM
Could this not just be a playlist?
yesterday at 9:41 PM
It is 14,139 videos.
You can open categories and see playlists for each of them.
yesterday at 10:45 PM
How come there are no ads?
yesterday at 9:29 PM
Build something to fix the wicked problems of the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem
Or https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/databases/25202804
The rules are the ai can't say the only winning move is to not play and it can't choose to kill everyone.
yesterday at 11:03 PM
Sounds good, but could you please make it so that it can also be viewed without Javascript being enabled?
yesterday at 9:06 PM
>>Opus downloaded all comments of HackerNews
I'm actually surprised this was that easy to do, ngl
yesterday at 9:56 PM
HN's Firebase-based API (https://github.com/hackernews/api) makes that easy, until you want to reconstruct the threads (i.e. who replied to who) and then it's annoying.
For years* I've wanted to replace that API with one we operate ourselves, which will simply return a JSON version of any HN URL.
I've finally started working on this! Perhaps my favorite thing about LLMs is how they make projects possible which would otherwise not have gotten started.
Edit: perhaps I should explain what I mean by that last bit.
The way I want this new API to work is (1) HN should use it internally to generate HTML pages, and (2) there can't be any regressions - nothing should change in the web version. This is a pain to get right, as it's easy subtly alter the details, and it's annoying to regression-test everything. Also, (3) with a design like this, it is easy—and critical not to—leak data that ought to remain private (e.g. people's IP addresses)
This is the sort of pain and annoyance that LLMs are amazing at taking care of. I get to focus on the parts I want to think about—the design and (yes) the code—and have a tireless assistant do the gruntwork and review. Without this I don't think I'd have gotten around to working on it.
* (edit: over a decade in fact - see collapsed reply)
yesterday at 10:04 PM
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36371539 (June 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36363325 (June 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32543023 (Aug 2022)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28715212 (Oct 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22788526 (April 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22496476 (March 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21798422 (Dec 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19231674 (Feb 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19219923 (Feb 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19058455 (Feb 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16720397 (March 2018)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11718683 (May 2016)
today at 3:14 AM
This is a very niche forum that contains mostly textual data. I believe the full dataset is under 20GBs.
yesterday at 10:15 PM
There turns out to be an export on HuggingFace as well as a bunch of parquets.
yesterday at 9:46 PM
I went into the blog, and saw only two entries in 2026. I dont know how to feel.
I dont know if its because the new state of things is that all knowledge is now secret and cant be shared.
Or if its because Opus 5.5 has turned even Karpathy into a product owner/manager so now the only interesting things are products (hackertube in this case).
Either of them makes me sad. Although its probably both.
Wake me up when true science is back.
In any case, im a big fan of Karpathy.
yesterday at 11:06 PM
I guess I learn something new about the HN crowd every day. When I loaded the page, half of the first screen were videos by IDW folks.
Pro tip for YouTube proper - turn off history and only view the “subscribed” page, and search for content that you really want to see. Oh and of course turn off autoplay and limit shorts to 0 views per day.
yesterday at 11:09 PM
I think I’m getting a different homepage or just unfamiliar with what you are referring to - is this what you mean by IDW? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_dark_web
yesterday at 11:20 PM
Yes. It appears to be random but the first time I loaded the page, on mobile, half of the videos featured well known IDW and populist types like Joe Rogan. So hardly what I would expect from culling recommended videos by a technical crowd.
today at 12:24 AM
I think you may have just gotten a bad roll since I have been scrolling on it for some time and haven’t seen any videos in that category. But I agree that that isn’t what I’d expect from the HN crowd
yesterday at 9:01 PM
> I'm sure this algorithm works well for the median person on the internet, but it definitely does not work for me
I see this sentiment expressed a lot regarding a variety of ways the internet has been enshittified. Are we really sure the median person would prefer this to better content if they were presented with an alternative?
And even if they would - what are the ethics of knowingly feeding slop to the masses?
today at 12:43 AM
a lot of this is still too maintstream
today at 1:22 AM
Whoa, what a breath of fresh air! Just watching videos without worrying about clickbait.
And those filters and sorting options - imagine what the internet could have been without enshittification.
today at 5:46 AM
Controversial opinion: The current state of the internet is not bad cause big tech has focused on increasing engagement. It has deteriorated cause normies have saturated the space. Projects like this are good because they have gone through the normie filter of hackernews.
I think if the big tech had focused on engagement while the users had remained mainly nerds and geeks, the result would've been extraordinary.
today at 12:52 AM
Ur filter missed Patrick Boyle, not only that dudes content is slop but his voice too xD
yesterday at 8:29 PM
Appreciate the effort, yet I think there is a place this is needed even more:
> It was Friday night at 11pm, I was tired, I went to YouTube to watch something and realized that I was looking at an enshittified wall of slop.
Please do the same thing on Social Media: Facebook, 'X', reddit, instagram, etc . Maybe find a 'hacker signal' that identifies quality content across those platforms and have them aggregated for the public so we don't have to spend time in the fascist network prisons.
The greatest trick - if it even can be pulled - would be setting it up in a way that it can't be sued out of existence by the angry platform overlords - if you can do this, then you are truly a genius, sir.
Free the people.
yesterday at 9:25 PM
I found this gem there: Rails Conf 2012 Keynote: Simplicity Matters by Rich Hickey (https://hackertube.org/watch/rI8tNMsozo0)
And lol ... Can you imagine how savage this is, with Rich's disgust with ORM and entangled concepts and like the audience sits there with their ActiveRecord and 10 levels deep inheritance and rails 'easy way' of doing stuff. Probably was a bigger shocker than dHH's keynote this year. lol
yesterday at 8:49 PM
Really cool idea. I also realized recently that whenever I enter YT, I enter "nshittified wall of slop"...
yesterday at 11:20 PM
Now redo it with DeepSeek 4.1 Flash, see how it compares.
yesterday at 10:46 PM
"I have doors that open like this. Not like this."
yesterday at 10:44 PM
i wished yt would be so fast. yt itself is the most bloated heavy app
today at 12:10 AM
Unfortunately HN is just another algorithm. It roughly aligns with what I already see on my youtube but includes some terribly old videos and a mix of videos from creators I'm currently subscribed to and channels I know I never want to watch again like Joe Rogan, Sabine Hossenfelder, Lex Fridman etc. This is indeed a HN video site and I hate it lol.
The youtube video recommendation algorithm isn't that bad if you're careful which videos you watch. Sometimes you'll take a risk on a video and it'll punish you with a week of similar videos though.
yesterday at 8:33 PM
> Media, journalism & propaganda
Amen, we should label it correctly more often. Hard to miss it nowadays, I guess.
yesterday at 8:30 PM
Where is the source, so I can roll my own specialized video site?
yesterday at 8:51 PM
I didn't publish the server because it's a vibe coded mess, but if you point your Opus 5.5 at the zip and ask for YouTube-like site it will be basically instant. This part was like 3 min.
EDIT: one caveat is that i couldn't distribute the YouTube data so you'd have to create a (free) API key for that part. Luckily it's only ~1 min of hassle.
yesterday at 9:47 PM
I have found out that first round of data scrape/ingestion is pretty easy.
The "black box" (for me) represents the next update. How can I avoid having to download all the data again and just use the new additions?
Do you have a plan for updates?
yesterday at 8:35 PM
Well, some portion of it was just served to you over HTTP.
It's very likely that your agents can just build the rest, if the backend source isn't provided.
today at 3:43 AM
[flagged]
today at 4:09 AM
Please do not cross into personal attack in HN comments.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
today at 12:09 AM
john oliver. Simon Sinek. c'mon guys
today at 6:36 AM
What's wrong with Simon Sinek?
yesterday at 9:34 PM
Changelog push from HN comments on this thread:
- Filters on search and topic pages: upload date, duration, type (talk, lecture, documentary, ...), and sort by upload date, view count, etc. (ty jahala, kiuiras, mixtureoftakes)
- Filters are now on the home page too, no need to search first. Picking one shows all matching videos, e.g. every lecture over an hour. (ty kkotak, macote, Aboutplants)
- Sort by "Recently recommended": orders by the latest HN recommendation instead of upload date, so a 2012 talk that someone linked last month floats to the top. Also a chip on the home page. (ty beaconflint, mixtureoftakes)
- Sort by like ratio as a quality signal: likes/views, damped so small videos can't win on a handful of likes. (ty gpugreg)
- "Play all on YouTube": turns the videos on a page (up to 50) into a temporary YouTube playlist, so it works in the YouTube app on phones and TVs. A start toward real HackerTube playlists. (ty twalichiewicz, waschl, victor9000)
- Removed the YouTube-looking logo. (ty doginasuit)
- HackerTube Longs: every video over an hour, right where YouTube puts Shorts. (ty gosen)
- Bonus: "Hidden gems" filter (loved on HN, under 100k views on YouTube), and "Evergreen only" to hide news-of-the-week videos.
today at 9:15 AM
You said somewhere it is vibe coded, but the prompts / requirements are fun to keep and follow :) might save a day or two of writing prompts
today at 4:24 AM
[flagged]
yesterday at 9:29 PM
yesterday at 9:25 PM
today at 7:01 AM
[dead]
today at 8:12 AM
[dead]
today at 2:18 AM
[dead]
yesterday at 11:39 PM
[flagged]
today at 2:24 AM
[dead]
today at 2:01 AM
[flagged]
yesterday at 7:56 PM
today at 5:55 AM
[dead]
yesterday at 8:47 PM
I can't find it on GitHub. Is it open source?
yesterday at 8:50 PM
Remarkably the source is so small I can just post it here.
> Let's write our own YouTube clone based on whatever videos have been recommended on Hacker News.
today at 12:47 AM
That's not the source; that's an exercise for the reader.
today at 3:15 AM
Obviously they were jesting but it shouldn't be more than a few paragraphs.
yesterday at 8:51 PM
> Is it open source? If not, I'm not going to use it.
Don't even use GitHub then as that is also closed source as well as this.
today at 5:19 AM
[dead]
yesterday at 10:09 PM
Can you add videos sourced from lobste.rs?
yesterday at 11:26 PM
[dead]
yesterday at 8:34 PM
[dead]
yesterday at 9:00 PM
One of the better ones but in all honesty a random ass vibed site that's on front page because Karpathy
yesterday at 9:02 PM
It is true and it is worth pointing out. Still, you have to admit that what he did here shows the distance of how easy it is to get from prompt to a working prototype if you have a clear idea of what you want to do (edit: his blog claims 3h.. which seems like a neat outcome if it includes gathering hn info from scratch ).
yesterday at 8:22 PM
yesterday at 10:33 PM
[flagged]
yesterday at 10:54 PM
No personal attacks, please.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
yesterday at 11:43 PM
[flagged]
today at 12:16 AM
Why do you think right wing extremism starts via youtube?
today at 1:37 AM
[flagged]
today at 1:59 AM
> the algorithm promotes fascist anti government positions
Isn't fascism an authoritarian ideology? How can someone be authoritarian and anti-government at the same time?
today at 2:21 AM
[flagged]
today at 2:22 AM
No that's not it, say again?
> A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
today at 3:17 AM
To me that sounds like anarchism, or maybe anarcho-capitalism. What makes fascism different from those ideologies?
today at 12:21 AM
[flagged]