One really interesting effect of the AirPods - is that its changed the paradigm - where the default choice of headphones is Bluetooth.

I personally own a pair of Beats fit pros - which are great for running, Zoom calls. But I recently acquired a schiit vestri and I pair these with some old wired seinheisers (HD1). I cannot overstate the drastic difference in quality.

It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

• leviathant

  yesterday at 8:47 PM

  I say this as someone with tens of thousands in audio equipment, as someone who can hear the compression warble in the hihats and the cymbals - audio quality with earbuds doesn't actually matter. It's like the argument for audio quality in cars - you're listening in a hostile environment, and convenience wins over fidelity. I remember walking to work one time with over-the-ear Sennheisers attached to my iPod and it felt ridiculous, and unsafe.

  I finally capitulated to earbuds when they started giving them away with the Pixel phones. The "find my" feature basically justifies the pro-prices, to me, because my biggest complaint about bluetooth earbuds in my own use case was how easily they're lost. I've lost and recovered my Pixel Buds Pro 2 a couple of times now. When traveling a lot by train and plane, the convenience of pocket-sized noise-cancelling earbuds has become worth it for me.

  But when I'm on meetings, I'm wired in. During the pandemic, I lost track of how many times my colleagues' Airpods would sputter out and die in the middle of a client meeting. Then they'd switch to wired headphones and their Macbook microphone. They sounded better, they could hear better, and there was no battery power sword of Damocles anymore.

  • gbromios

    today at 9:51 AM

    > I finally capitulated to earbuds

    I'm not audiophile, but I was prepared to do the same, despite the discomfort and obviously-lower sound quality... but the mic isn't even sufficient for meetings in a public place (e.g. a diner at lunch time), whereas my laptop's builtin mic is. How can they expect us to use these things??

  • Cruncharoo

    yesterday at 9:59 PM

    Disagree slightly with audio quality for cars. I recently got a car with "good" speakers and the difference from regular car speakers is striking. Although I'm sure that the curve quickly flattens on spending more to get more quality, going above the base car speaker level has been awesome for me.

    • ryandrake

      yesterday at 10:09 PM

      I think the point is that when you're driving (at least in a combustion engine car), the 60-70dB noise floor is so high that it almost doesn't matter how good the speakers are in an ideal silent, soundproof chamber.

      • snissn

        yesterday at 10:42 PM

        I recommend ripping your car apart and putting sound insulation panels everywhere you can! Also replacing your sound system...

        • rootusrootus

          today at 4:01 AM

          There's only so much you can do. A car is filled with funny angles, plastics, and a lot of glass. It's never going to be a particularly good acoustic environment even if you manage to shield 100% of the road noise.

          • 2III7

            today at 6:36 AM

            You can make it so much better than stock with proper insulation and speaker elements. Car manufacturers often use 5€$ elements which sound like shit.

            • rramon

              today at 8:08 AM

              You can't have a proper soundstage in a car no matter your setup, which kinda degrades a lot of music that wasn't designed for clubs. In a car it's basically background music when you're driving because you can't really give the music your full attention anyway (passive listening), where the lack of focus also masks a lot of details you'd hear on a proper stereo system (active listening).

              Edit: to answer your question below, I like both, active and passive listening. But I wouldn't try to optimize for active criteria like details in a passive evironment like a car, so I'd spend more money on fun things like buttkickers instead of high end detail.

              • 2III7

                today at 8:57 AM

                Obviously a car isn't a dedicated listening room. Music can be enjoyed by just listening to it and not focusing on all the nuances. Or are you one of those hardcore audiophiles who can't listen to music without a ultra high end sound system?

                Also soundstage can be greatly improved by placing speakers on non factory locations because manufacturers usually prioritize packaging above all else. A tweeter placed at the bottom of the A-pillar near the windshield is the worst possible location and sounds like it was put in a tin can.

                Background noise in a car also has a solution, turning up the volume. Plus getting quiet tires.

        • ExoticPearTree

          today at 8:18 AM

          > I recommend ripping your car apart and putting sound insulation panels everywhere you can! Also replacing your sound system...

          Ripping the car apart to install sound insulation might void your warranty.

          I have a Bose sound system in my car with 11 or 13 speakers (they're everywhere), but the car is so poorly insulated that I have to turn up the volume quite a lot at highway speeds, or even after about ~ 35-40MPH.

          • skhr0680

            today at 8:41 AM

            > Ripping the car apart to install sound insulation might void your warranty.

            On my Toyota it only involved basic removal of interior panels, I can't imagine that affecting warranty or resale

        • taneq

          yesterday at 11:59 PM

          Or you can just embrace the 128kbps lifestyle. :D

        • imp0cat

          today at 4:33 AM

          That's the point, isn't it? You'd have to spend a lot of money on related stuff before audio upgrades, otherwise those audio upgrades are just money wasted.

      • smallstepforman

        today at 8:47 AM

        You also need microphones to pick up ambient sound and play it back at 180 phase shift ..

        There is a reason premium audio car packages cost over 2000$

      • spectra-cole

        yesterday at 11:49 PM

        Car's have it really tough in the audio department. SO many things work against it

      • yesterday at 10:39 PM

    • ErneX

      yesterday at 10:09 PM

      In cars it’s also important how good it isolates you from the engine and external noise like wind and wheels on the road. Some cars even have noise cancellation for that.

      • rootusrootus

        today at 4:02 AM

        Some cars have gone so far on the isolation and sound damping front that they pipe back in a little bit of engine noise (but only the part that sounds sporty) via the speakers.

  • erxam

    yesterday at 8:52 PM

    I agree. Hell, when I'm listening to music with my full-fat expensive setup, even the noise of the fans in my desktop computer is distracting and adversarial to the listening environment. Bringing those cans outside would be insane.

  • danvayn

    today at 2:30 AM

    Convenience is close. IMO it’s all about accessibility, or more generally Good UX. Your coworkers AirPods died because they used it consistently and could just get up and walk around without having to take them out. They were always on because they were in ear and had no reason to be disconnected. They’ll turn off the moment you take them out on iPhones atleast. This is a small example of how the user experience in the Apple Ecosystem for AirPods has been kind of nuts. So if you’re on these devices, there is a palpable difference in ‘convenience’ that goes beyond what is carry-able or safe or consistent.

    To further this concept, the reason why you tolerate variable quality isn’t just convenience or accessibility. It’s because you can’t carry your setup around, yes, but furthermore you don’t habitually listen to music because you have the best setup. You do it because you love music. In that regard, the user experiences do become interchangeable. Quality music is accessible on every device and you will listen to it with anything if you love music. The user experience enjoyment levels are ultimately similar with most devices for you, purely when it comes to music listening, just because you love music. It’s a consistently good UX for you.

    I say all of this as someone who has also wasted money on expensive listening devices (and loves music) and also someone who isn’t like, crazy about the modern Apple UX. They just got earbuds right when it comes to the experience of an Apple ecosystem user.

    • Normal_gaussian

      today at 7:59 AM

      > They’ll turn off the moment you take them out on iPhones atleast. This is a small example of how the user experience in the Apple Ecosystem for AirPods has been kind of nuts.

      Every 'pod' type headphones I've used do this. It's odd you admit to only knowing Apple, then use it to support Apple being superior.

  • ErneX

    yesterday at 10:12 PM

    Sound quality is worse when transmitting and receiving over Bluetooth, when I use the AirPods for calls on the MacBook I switch to the microphone on the MacBook, they will hear me better and I will hear them better since the AirPods will use all the bandwidth for outputting audio only.

    • pedalpete

      yesterday at 10:18 PM

      Are you sure this is a bandwidth issue?

      I always assumed it was more about the position and size of the microphone.

      • y04nn

        yesterday at 10:44 PM

        When making a call and using headset mic+earphones the audio mode/profile drops back to HFP instead of A2DP used for music. The quality difference is huge. By using the computer mic you can keep using A2DP with better quality for your voice capture and listening experience.

        • Normal_gaussian

          today at 8:02 AM

          And many of the mics built into good webcams and laptops are superior, so long as you aren't somewhere like a café.

      • linsomniac

        yesterday at 11:14 PM

        >Are you sure this is a bandwidth issue?

        It's technically not a bandwidth issue, AFAIK, it is a "profile" issue. When listening to audio only you are using a different bluetooth profile than when you are using it for two way mic+speakers.

        Try playing some music on your computer and then start a video call. Even before I jump into the meeting, as soon as I hit the Google meet site and it opens up the meeting "camera preview" page, the music quality goes straight into the toilet.

        This also happens to my "puck" speaker+mic array that is connected via USB.

        • fn-mote

          yesterday at 11:47 PM

          > This also happens to my "puck" speaker+mic array that is connected via USB.

          Argh. Isn’t this direct evidence that it is not the “Bluetooth profile”? Since it’s directly connected via USB?

      • echoangle

        yesterday at 10:24 PM

        They mean that the audio quality you hear on the AirPods is better if you only listen to audio compared to listening and using the microphone. I don’t know if that happens on Macs too, but it’s certainly true when using AirPods on Linux because you have to switch the profile when you want to use the microphone and then the audio is really compressed for playback.

        • TomGarden

          yesterday at 11:15 PM

          Yeah, it's the same on Mac/iphone but better codecs. Still lossy but better than the Android experience

    • tshaddox

      yesterday at 11:28 PM

      This is certainly the opposite of my experience. The sound quality from someone speaking via their MacBook microphone is noticeably worse than someone speaking via their AirPods microphone.

  • nunez

    yesterday at 11:59 PM

    I use my Shokz headset for calls. The boom directional mic is excellent at suppressing background noise on its own and the connection is super reliable with the USB-C dongle (that works on phones as well as laptops)

• ChrisMarshallNY

  today at 10:00 AM

  I have a friend that was in the music industry for decades, and listening to music was a significant aspect of his job.

  To this day (he’s retired),he won’t use wireless (even ones with bespoke connections).

  I use AirPods when I take my morning walks. The shitty quality is actually a plus, because I can hear the cars that try to run me over (I walk at 5:30 AM, and people are not at the top of their game, at that time).

  I have a couple of pairs of Bose QC headphones, for in-home listening. There’s nothing [wireless] that comes close.

  The new regular AirPods are interesting to me.

• chis

  yesterday at 8:15 PM

  The connection type has nothing to do with it though. Modern bluetooth is basically transparent with 256kbps AAC, like you'd have to be an omega-expert listening in a silent room to identify it vs lossless. Certainly the difference you're noticing is just the headphone quality.

  Honestly for me the Airpods 4 with ANC are one of the greatest feats of audio engineering ever. For such a tiny form factor they reproduce really great sound, big soundstage, AND they have good ANC without needing a closed earbud seal. They also have internal mics that listen to the response of your ear to adjust the sound profile, which you can hear happen in real time after bumping the earbuds. Obviously you can get better sound if you make different tradeoffs and wear over-ears, but they are absolutely cutting edge for what they are.

  • michaelt

    yesterday at 9:35 PM

    > Modern bluetooth is basically transparent with 256kbps AAC, like you'd have to be an omega-expert listening in a silent room to identify it vs lossless.

    Sure, unless you want to do something rare and exotic like, say, have a microphone on your headset. Then you get the HFP/HSP profile, which makes two tin cans linked by a string seem high quality by comparison.

    • thedrexster

      today at 9:54 AM

      Oh my god, TIL -- thank you, brother, I've apparently been doing this incorrectly for years.

    • catlifeonmars

      today at 3:22 AM

      I am now curious how much you can optimize the quality of a tin cans and a string. You could encode the sound digitally over the string perhaps. I wonder what bitrate (also bandwidth) you can achieve.

      • MrDOS

        today at 9:03 AM

        Well, you can do 3.5 Mbps ADSL over wet string[0], which is about 5 channels of uncompressed 16-bit PCM at 44.1 KHz.

        [0]: https://www.revk.uk/2017/12/its-official-adsl-works-over-wet...

      • skhr0680

        today at 8:50 AM

        Using acoustic data transmission because it is easy and I am lazy, I'd guess comparable to copper wire broadband based on the short distances involved in an average tin-can + string operation.

    • chamomeal

      today at 5:11 AM

      Wait is that why my airpods (playing via my Mac) sound like crap as soon as somebody calls me? Cause the microphone turns on?

      • saltmate

        today at 5:23 AM

        Yes it is

    • echoangle

      yesterday at 10:26 PM

      If you’re outside with a smartphone, why do you actually need that though? If you call someone, their audio will be bad anyways, and when do you need playback and microphone at the same time? Outside multiplayer gaming, I don’t really know any application where high quality audio playback and microphone is needed at the same time.

      • ssl-3

        yesterday at 10:53 PM

        I can understand people just fine with the voice profiles provided by Bluetooth. Strictly speaking, I don't need anything better than that.

        But it sure is nice to be able to make phone calls where people don't sound worse than they did with digitally-switched analog landline telephones in 1995. Bluetooth doesn't get there at all.

        The losses of Bluetooth even compound generationally: The inescapable tin-can audio of Bluetooth at one end first gets transmogrified by at least one intermediate lossy codec for transmission across/betwixt the network(s), and then gets tin-canned harder when the far end of the connection is also using Bluetooth.

        For perspective: 1995's phone calls were ultimately limited by the G.711 codec, which itself dates to 1972. I'm not setting the bar very high here at all.

        • echoangle

          yesterday at 11:22 PM

          Calls on AirPods don’t sound worse to me than on the phone speakers, I don’t think the AirPods noticeably decrease the quality compared to the stuff happening on the phone network.

          • zamadatix

            today at 12:36 AM

            "The phone network"? As in the usually 8 kHz to 16 kHz quality call typically encoding at ~a quarter the rate of dial-up?

            Of course that sounds like a tin can either way, it's coming in encoded with the quality of a tin can! People here are talking about modern VoIP calls (Teams/Slack/Discord/Zoom/etc) which have a snowball's chance in hell of sounding decent in the first place. HSP/HFP will often crank that right back down to traditional phone network quality again. You also lose stereo, which isn't so bad if the only thing you're doing is having a 1:1 call but kind of sucks for a background group call.

            • ExoticPearTree

              today at 8:40 AM

              The "phone network" nowadays offer high quality sound. Things improved drastically with VoLTE and other technologies which allows much more bandwidth for calls than the old networks could support.

            • ssl-3

              today at 1:18 AM

              I mean: I, for one, was definitely talking about telephone calls. :)

              But now that you mention it: Yeah, the state of common VoIP (Teams/Slack/Zoom/whatever) is also usually not very good. It's like there's some huge bandwidth crunch here in 2026 that is driven by the strenuous demands of VoIP, except: There isn't.

              When I was doing some live streaming with others in a studio a couple of years ago, we worked with some of that. It never sounded very good. (It doesn't sound very good when the big-time acts at CBS or NPR or Fox News do it, either.)

              But! When we occasionally had remote co-hosts who had enough technical competence to make it work properly on their end, we were able to use SonoBus[1]. That audio was positively pristine, like they were sitting unseen in the same room as everyone else.

              [1]: https://www.sonobus.net/

              • today at 2:54 AM

      • michaelt

        yesterday at 10:53 PM

        I think it's fairly obvious why one would want two-way audio on a telephone :)

        • echoangle

          yesterday at 11:21 PM

          As I mentioned in my comment, I don’t notice the worse Bluetooth quality on calls because the audio itself is already bad, so making calls isn’t really a reason to not use Bluetooth.

          • agentdev001

            yesterday at 11:38 PM

            Your comment frustrates me! With that said, how about Discord? I have high speed internet 90% of my waking life, high enough for Discord to be high fidelity. I actively avoid using discord to join calls on my phone- because Bluetooth absolutely destroys quality. I use the same pair of headphones to use discord on my PC, with a separate mic, no problemo.

      • smallmancontrov

        yesterday at 10:36 PM

        Need? A committee of the dumbest software on your pc/phone will get together to tell you what you need, and they have decided you need tin-can audio quality so that the microphone can be active so that AT&T spyware embedded in the Taco Bell app can listen for off-hand comments about refreshing your phone to opportunistically target you with the spam-cannon.

    • tshaddox

      yesterday at 11:30 PM

      Surely it would be very rare to want to listen to music at its highest quality while simultaneously recording your voice. It’s perhaps conceivable for some sort of niche mode of music or audio production, I suppose.

      • bmurphy1976

        today at 12:35 AM

        I'm frequently listening to music or a video in the background. Join a zoom call early because I don't want to be late, instant AM radio. You can argue I shouldn't do this, I'll argue that it shouldn't matter and should just work. It's 2026, not 1926.

      • trissylegs

        today at 12:01 AM

        I often play games while on discord voice chat. The audio quality of my game suffers. Unless I use a separate mike. (Which is how I solve it)

  • Aozora7

    today at 9:45 AM

    Isn't the main issue that the audio you're compressing over bluetooth, like spotify streams, is already compressed? As far as I know, compressing already compressed audio compounds artifacts in the same way re-saving a JPEG does.

  • ssl-3

    yesterday at 8:35 PM

    Modern pocket supercomputers don't divulge anything useful about the kind of connection that is being used for Bluetooth audio so we don't know if it's using 256kbps AAC or something else instead, and it cuts out in some areas of [insert city], and when it comes back it sounds demonstrably worse.

    It's an inscrutable mess.

    Wires don't have these problems. Plug them in. Use them. Clean the contacts every now and then if/when they get crudded up.

  • numpad0

    yesterday at 10:23 PM

    > 256kbps AAC

    That only works with A2DP one-way audio. The two-way HFP mode still uses the horrible classic BT compression unless the new BLE-based LE Audio is used(but IIUC Apple still don't support it). Besides there are still many devices that only supports BT's own 2000s-optimal SBC codec.

  • matsemann

    yesterday at 8:49 PM

    Connection type means the sound quality drops significantly when headphones are used for speaking, though. Maybe don't notice as much in normal calls / only speech, but using Bluetooth when gaming and some kinda of voice chat makes all game music / ambient sounds sound so crunchy.

    • w4der

      yesterday at 8:59 PM

      For some reason my iphone sporadically won't go back to "music quality" mode after cutting a call on a wireless speaker or car play, and it's incredible how bad music sounds with telephone quality.

    • throwuxiytayq

      yesterday at 9:02 PM

      The trick is to switch input to the laptop/external mic. Audio quality stays great. It’s kind of ridiculous that Bluetooth still needs the shitty lo-fi mode when the mic is on - I was recently surprised that this is still the case with modern headphones like it was a decade ago.

  • thefz

    yesterday at 8:30 PM

    Nah put on some quality headphones and the sound stage will blow your head off.

    • jack_pp

      yesterday at 8:45 PM

      Comparison is the thief of joy. I remember when I first got a 1080p display, comparing it to my previous 480p one the difference was amazing, but before I got the 1080p display I had no problem with my old one.

      All that to say.. what's best, cheap, no wires, no headaches and happy or expensive, wires, having to download music and make a library etc and always looking for the next high, the next minor improvement?

      One of the happiest days of my life was when I listened to my music on a 10$ mp3 player with 2$ earphones after 3 months of not listening to it.

      So yeah, you may be right, even though I've tried 3000$ open-ear audiophile headphones, with an amazing amplifier, listening on tidal and it didn't blow me away but even if it did, I'd be stupid to even try, then I'd know what I'm missing and craving a 5000$ setup when I'm already happy with the 1 inch box I can easily carry wherever I go.

    • NBJack

      yesterday at 11:06 PM

      Beyerdynamic has ruined me. And it's not even the best out there.

• stouset

  yesterday at 8:26 PM

  I'm reminded of a quote: "the best camera is the one you have on you." People ditched their digital cameras en masse when smartphones became popular. Not because the smartphone cameras were better, but because they were convenient.

  The market has spoken. People drastically prefer the convenience of Bluetooth over the quality that comes along with having to constantly untangle wires or having audio cut in and out from failing wires.

  On top of that, universal adoption of noise cancellation has resulted in dramatically better quality in practice than what people were using in 2005. Yes, wired headphones with noise cancellation are even better, but not to a point that people are willing to sacrifice the convenience of going wireless.

  • erik

    yesterday at 8:39 PM

    > People ditched their digital cameras en masse when smartphones became popular. Not because the smartphone cameras were better, but because they were convenient.

    The early 00's transition from CRT to LCD monitors was similar. The early desktop LCD panels were expensive, had worse refresh rates, worse contrast, and worse colour rendering. To this day, even very good modern displays struggle to match CRT motion rendering.

    But LCDs are so much thinner and lighter, and that was enough to overcome the disadvantages.

    • michaelt

      yesterday at 9:55 PM

      CRTs were also small at any reasonable price.

      A 20" viewable area, 1920 x 1440 CRT in the late 1990s? $800 [1] and that was the king of monitors.

      A 22", 1920 x 1080 flat screen today? $65 [2] and considered the most basic, mundane screen out there.

      And inflation-adjusted? That $800 monitor was $1500 in today's money.

      [1] https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/comparison,497.html [2] https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CVM2GJCN

      • saltcured

        yesterday at 10:41 PM

        Ha, my mid 90s 21" Nanao CRT cost more than my used car was worth. I went on to get some high-end CRTs with Trinitron tubes after that at work.

        But, as soon as I could get an LCD with DVI-D input, I never wanted to go back to a CRT. I just got whatever high resolution Dell LCD monitors I could find. I was much happier with perfect pixel addressing and zero bleed for rendering my text terminals and source code. I didn't care about color rendition and hardly cared about ghosting from scrolling.

      • dhosek

        today at 2:49 AM

        There’s also the depth. A crt monitor would have a depth at least equal to the diagonal measurement which meant a lot of desk space lost to the monitor. On the other hand that also meant some prime cat nesting space that was lost with the lcd transition.

  • twright

    yesterday at 8:33 PM

    I think this is a great explanation. To add to it, I believe there is something durability too. My basic Jabra wireless earbuds from 2020 are just now getting faulty (just battery stuff). In a similar time period from 2010 and 2015 I went through at least 6 pairs of wired headphones or earbuds, the jacks would fail or the wires would just stop working.

• Aurornis

  yesterday at 10:27 PM

  > But I recently acquired a schiit vestri and I pair these with some old wired seinheisers (HD1). I cannot overstate the drastic difference in quality.

  These sound better because they're $500 full-size headphones, not because they lack Bluetooth.

  > It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today

  The AirPods use 256kbps AAC. If you set up a true ABX test, you would not be able to tell the difference between 256kbps AAC and lossless using the same gear.

• skhr0680

  today at 8:36 AM

  > It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

  Comparing Apples to Apples, AirPods are definitely sound better and are more useful than the pack-in iPod earphones that everyone used back then.

• leokennis

  today at 7:23 AM

  The average Joe, via AirPods and the like, in 2026 has access to vastly better audio than in 2005.

  In 2005, you had serious and expensive high end audio from the established brands (Sennheiser, Beyerdynamic etc.) and you had consumer audio for consumer prices that sounded pretty terrible: no bass extension, flat mids.

  In 2026 you have:

  - Serious and expensive high end audio from the established brands (maybe even some of the same models as 2005...)

  - A new category of convenience driven "mid-fi" like all the Sony, Bose etc. ANC headphones and AirPods Pro - often with the "laid back, a lot of bass, slightly recessed mids" sound signature but still producing very acceptable sound

  - Consumer audio for consumer prices, but now even the cheap earbuds and headphones (JBL, chinese brands etc.) sound by all means passable, are wireless, have good battery life

  I would say there has never been a better time to be a "good sound enjoyer" than now.

• toasty228

  yesterday at 8:08 PM

  $19 iems sound better than airpods, the bar is that low, but normies don't care, most probably listen to spotify on auto and get 96kbps anyways. When the batteries invariably die after 2-3 years they'll send another $150 to Tim Apple while their old airpod finally become the e-waste they were destined to be

  • Aurornis

    yesterday at 10:31 PM

    > $19 iems sound better than airpods, the bar is that low, but normies don't care,

    I have several sets of high end headphones and have spent more on audio equipment than I probably should.

    I enjoy my AirPods very much. They're great. They don't replace full-size headphones, but that's not what I bought them for.

    I find all of this brand-bashing and talk about "normies" to be funny. The AirPods lineup is actually really enjoyed in the kinds of audiophile circles where they actually measure stuff and don't care which logo is on the box.

    I don't get the comparison to the $19 IEMs because they're completely different product than the AirPods.

    • leetbulb

      today at 3:36 AM

      There's a surprisingly large number of people who have a negative opinion of AirPods (including their audio quality) while having never tried them. I've owned and tried some very high quality IEMs and still to this day impressed by the AirPods' audio quality and convenience. I've not found any wireless IEMs that come anywhere close.

  • hellohello2

    yesterday at 10:41 PM

    To offer a counterpoint, Airpods Pro are a great product that significantly increased my quality of life. Depending on how sensitive you are to noise then having easily accessible/socially acceptable noise cancelling is incredible. Perhaps you are too much of a normie to get it ;)

  • kmac_

    today at 7:13 AM

    My AirPods 3 just won't quit and they sound awesome for what they are. My only issue is that they’re a pain to find if they drop in the snow.

  • nbf_1995

    yesterday at 8:15 PM

    Tim Apple stepped down. It's John Apple now

    • excalibur

      today at 3:22 AM

      Young Johnny Appleseed

    • leoooodias

      yesterday at 9:45 PM

      Turnips

  • spiderice

    today at 4:37 AM

    I don't think I can adequately express how few fucks I give about my AirPods becoming e-waste. My god, the depressing mental state that some of you must live in...

    • toasty228

      today at 9:07 AM

      The only thing depressing is the current state of the world, especially in regard to pollution and resources usage.

      You're free to be an egoistic brain dead consumer, most people are, so go for it! Ignorance is bliss as they say

  • purpleflame1257

    yesterday at 8:15 PM

    Now John Apple.

  • dsr_

    yesterday at 8:43 PM

    To be clear, Truthear Gates cost almost $23 with the microphone option when they are not on sale... but yes.

    • ta8903

      today at 7:08 AM

      Hey, I have those :) To be fair the microphones on cheap IEMs always suck, and you're probably better off using the mic on your device.

  • VirusNewbie

    yesterday at 11:05 PM

    this is not even remotely true. I have plenty of headphones, Airpod Pros are quite good sound quality.

• lucideer

  today at 8:17 AM

  > It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

  This isn't really true in any applicable way though.

  Firstly, most people in 2005 were ripping CDs onto their ipods at itunes' 128kbps default - you're still only getting 160kbps today if you're running the free ad-supported Spotify plan but more people are paying for full quality.

  More importantly though, the biggest impact on sound quality is noise isolation. People listen to music on the street, in an office bullpen, or public transport: in 2005 your wired sennheissers would need to be overear to deal with that environment in any reasonable manner.The ANC in even the non-pro in-ear airpods is giving you a night-&-day improvement.

• juiceland

  yesterday at 8:53 PM

  >I cannot overstate the drastic difference in quality.

  Quality is governed by your subjective experience. The HD1s are tuned in a way that, paired with the Vestri and the files, creates the experience that you enjoy better. That's it. It's not about "better quality" and definitely not about "fidelity."

  You also paid probably $99 for something that Apple perfected and sells for $10 -- that USB DAC. Which is fine! You should spend money on things that make you happy.

  >The quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

  This sentence doesn't have enough detail. What is quality supposed to mean here?

  • blitzar

    today at 6:41 AM

    Upgrading to solid gold connectors with platinum wires will increase the audio "fidelity" noticeably (/s)

    • mastermage

      today at 9:35 AM

      You plebs use Gold I only use Diamond Coated Connectors. For CRYSTAL Clear Sound and fidelity.

• vlod

  yesterday at 10:41 PM

  > where the default choice of headphones is Bluetooth.

  Unfortunately not giving wired headphones away (with the phone purchase) and not including the standard 3.5 mm headphone jack, means that 'normal' people just put their phone calls and play their video on speaker, to the annoyance of everyone (on public transport).

• bpev

  yesterday at 8:04 PM

  You say that as if this wasn't completely to plan. The release of the first airpods and the first iPhone sans headphone jack were at the same time. It was brute-forced.

• jihadjihad

  yesterday at 8:12 PM

  We've been over this for a couple decades now. The average consumer simply cannot tell the difference between lossless and compressed codecs. Even back 20-25 years ago when people carried around CD players, vanishingly few people batted an eye when those went the way of the dodo and devices started getting loaded up with shitty 128 kbps MP3s. The difference in quality mattered far less than the convenience.

  There are many, many people who are even technically minded who would be surprised that their expensive AirPods Max cannot reproduce lossless audio from Apple Music when used wirelessly.

  • WarmWash

    yesterday at 8:27 PM

    >The average consumer simply cannot tell the difference between lossless and compressed codecs.

    The average audiophile can't either.

    Don't believe me? Try it for yourself, bust out your most expensive DAC and headphones, but be careful, you can't unexperience this

    https://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_abx

    • kazinator

      yesterday at 8:32 PM

      You can totally tell, at lower bitrates. People used to share songs as MP3 files using 128 kbps rates, and you could easily hear whooshy/chirpy artifacts in those at times.

      Modern codec at a decent bitrate: inaudible.

      Ironically, it could be the expensive DAC and headphones that helps the codec conceal itself.

      That is to say, an audiophile who prefers gear that causes pleasant distortion might hear a difference through that gear, because the codec doesn't account for trying to mask its artifacts through equipment distortion (perhaps distortion in the ear itself only).

      Say the codec removes something from the signal on the psycho-acoustic hypothesis that it is masked by something louder occurring close to before or after. That hypothesis is correct under hi-fi conditions, but suppose that the user's distorting tube power amp brings out that something, making it audible. Then removing it is potentially audible!

      • Stevvo

        yesterday at 8:55 PM

        A lot of the time people were sharing transcodes because they didn't know any better. Same thing happens for video content today, e.g. most video on X looks like 240p because of it.

• randomfrogs

  yesterday at 8:32 PM

  Different people want different things. Whenever I wore wired headphones, I was always catching the wire on things, and I found them really inconvenient - to the point where when I bought a new phone the headphones just went into my pile of unused headphones. AirPods were a complete change for me - I use them constantly. The sound quality difference is irrelevant - I just won't wear wired headphones - the hassle isn't worth it for me.

  • consumer451

    yesterday at 8:38 PM

    Man, I am the biggest curmudgeon in this regard. I wear my old wired headphones, wire under my shirt, to a BT-BA001 "low-latency BT transceiver" in my pants pocket.

• mastermage

  today at 7:12 AM

  As someone with probably already a bit of hearing damage and who is generally not an Audiophile. I remember when i switched from Wired Headphones to Wireless and man I cannot hear the difference. Which I assume many people don't either. For me it is no difference in hearing pleasure and much more comfort.

• alexjplant

  yesterday at 8:26 PM

  > It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

  I seem to recall most people being perfectly content with 128kbps MP3s on iPod earbuds back in the day. Only audiophiles/nerds (of which there seem to be more now) were into actual headphones and amp setups and there's never been greater market choice in this regard.

• nosioptar

  yesterday at 8:00 PM

  I got a pair of Bose qc-25 and a fiio q1 for about the price of a set of earbuds. (Bose were refurbs from bose's ebay store and fiio was closing out the q1 at the time.) That combo kicks the everloving shit out of any Bluetooth headphones I've tried.

  • cyberpunk

    yesterday at 8:07 PM

    Wait until you upgrade to a set of grados :}

• drop_star

  yesterday at 8:18 PM

  Im used to listening to a staticy job site radio half way across the shop. I dont really care about the quality as long as its better than that. I feel most people are the same.

• mrheosuper

  today at 2:07 AM

  >the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today

  Is it tho ? I remember back in the day, most of my music collection is in 128kbps mp3, well under the bandwidth of bluetooth

  • 72deluxe

    today at 10:06 AM

    But did you notice at the time that it sounded chronically awful? Cymbals and hihats sound like someone eating with their mouth open.

• brudgers

  today at 2:00 AM

  I often use wired $10 Sony ZX headphones and for audio even those are vastly superior to any earbuds, including my AirPod Pros.

  The AirPods were the most convenient piece of electronics I’ve ever owned, but the sound is earbud quality.

• al_borland

  yesterday at 8:02 PM

  I would venture to guess that the average user can’t tell. Most of the time, I’m just looking for some background noise, not a listening experience. The speaker on the iPhone is good enough for that.

  I have a pair of wired Seinheisers, and they sound great, but 99% of the time, my priority is convenience, and anything that makes sound will do.

• asdff

  yesterday at 11:29 PM

  It is even worse in home theater. People went from legit sound systems with an amp and speaker wire runs to actual speakers, proper audio channels, to what at best a sound bar from walmart and zero dynamic range.

  • Blackthorn

    today at 2:47 AM

    I've intentionally killed the dynamic range of my system because sound engineers can't mix dialog for shit nowadays.

    • mastermage

      today at 9:36 AM

      Looking at you Christopher Nolan

    • asdff

      today at 8:02 AM

      Are you streaming or are these blu ray? Streaming is trash ime.

    • imp0cat

      today at 4:37 AM

      Precisely, it's a feature nowadays.

• naet

  yesterday at 8:40 PM

  On my older android phone I always have problems watching anything with bluetooth headphones adding so much lag that the video gets very desynced with the audio. So I will continue to use wired headphones (now via usb-c adapter since the dedicated port is gone)

  • DiggyJohnson

    yesterday at 9:09 PM

    My 2016 Toyota Corolla has a 1.5 second audio lag and it’s my only issue with the vehicle. No clean way to update or upgrade just the Bluetooth component either.

• whycome

  yesterday at 9:11 PM

  Not just audio quality. Playback and consumption quality. My Winamp setup c 2005 was worlds better than what’s possible now on a typical listening device. Eq. Crossfading. Visualizer.

  All possible but not common

• gwbas1c

  yesterday at 9:11 PM

  FYI: There are now lossless Bluetooth codecs if you care to find them.

• dimitrisscript

  today at 4:20 AM

  Can you get anc with wired ones?

• raverbashing

  today at 7:29 AM

  Talking about sound quality: I'm surprised at how good the Apple event sounded, even on your average (wired) headphones

  Sounds much better than some 80% of YT videos

• bluescrn

  yesterday at 8:55 PM

  I used to obsess over audio quality. But then I reached my 40s, and it started to become clear that my ageing ears were becoming the limiting factor.

  Now I just embrace the convenience of Bluetooth and usefulness of noise cancelling.

  (But then again, even my AirPods or Sony XM4s are high fidelity compared to what many of the kids these days are listening with, small mono bluetooth speakers or playing music out of their phone speakers)

• tristor

  today at 1:07 AM

  > It is quite absurd (but categorically true) that the quality of audio that folks were generally listening to in 2005 was better than what we are doing today.

  I don't believe this statement is true, as someone who cares about audio quality and has been making my own audio equipment and buying high end audio gear since well before 2005. The bar for the average has raised considerably in the last 21 years, even though it was always possible to have better. I use AirPods when I'm traveling on a plane or walking/commuting by public transit and to take phone calls, when I want to listen to music critically I have a >$10k headphone setup that obviously puts a pair of AirPods to shame. They're not the same device for the same use case, and that doesn't make them somehow "bad". Use the right tool for the job.

• wat10000

  today at 12:21 AM

  The average person was not listening to music with multi-hundred-dollar headphones in 2005. They were using cheap earbuds.

• bethekidyouwant

  yesterday at 8:10 PM

  If you are using apple then its AAC from your phone directly to your headphones… so not seeing where the quality drop would come from.

• napierzaza

  yesterday at 10:09 PM

  [dead]

I wonder if it's still the case that, if I buy expensive Apple AirPods to use with my expensive Apple computer, I'm denied the ability to add them to Find My unless I also buy an expensive Apple phone. And I also wonder whether the AirPods case is going to make an alarm noise whenever I move it, to punish me for having the audacity to think it would be a good idea to buy expensive Apple earbuds to use with my expensive Apple computer, while not owning an iPhone.

This is so hilarious, apple selling volume up and down as it were some fantastical feature and not have been present in air pods pro since god nows when.

> Force sensor with volume swipe arrives on AirPods 5, a first for the open-ear form factor, adding the ability to quickly adjust volume by swiping up or down on the stem.

Pure apple marketing juice this one.

• tshaddox

  yesterday at 7:38 PM

  Only if "pure marketing juice" means "plainly telling people about a straightforward feature they're adding to one of their products." Which like, okay, that is what marketing is, but are you suggesting they don't tell people?

  • ChrisRR

    today at 10:10 AM

    Because they're being very awkwardly specific in order to make it sound like they're the first to do it.

  • belval

    yesterday at 7:44 PM

    I think it's the:

    > a first for the open-ear form factor

    That is being called out as comical.

    • anyfoo

      yesterday at 10:38 PM

      But it is? At least for AirPods. The AirPods Pro are not open-ear form factor. I do not know about other open-ear airbuds.

      • jkahrs595

        today at 2:32 AM

        Two separate models from Huawei have swipe volume controls (freearc and freeclip). I’m not a earbud guru but my $25 anker buds have tap to hold volume controls (not swipe, I’m sure Apple is being specific for a reason), but no matter how you move the goalposts it’s a ridiculous claim.

        • mastermage

          today at 9:38 AM

          can confirm my Huawei Freebud 4 have swipe volume controls, anc and do not have silicone tip. Which is one of the reasons I got them after my Gen 1 Airpods started to annoy me on Android.

        • Gigachad

          today at 4:11 AM

          They all have the squishy silicone part that goes in your ear. The claim on the apple page is it's for the ones that don't have that. Which is true.

          It's not a particularly crazy innovation but the statement is true.

          • lkois

            today at 6:32 AM

            No they don't. The two Huawei models mentioned are completely different form factors, that are much more open-ear and further from squishy silicone than any Airpods.

            This is exactly the assumption that the carefully worded juice hopes you'll make. That Apple's claim to innovation precludes even a cursory glance at the competition

        • anyfoo

          today at 4:33 AM

          Are they open ear?

          • crossroadsguy

            today at 7:30 AM

            Wouldn't a more traditionally appropriate question be: "but are those Apple"?

          • Catagris

            today at 7:28 AM

            They are both ear wrap around so apples to oranges.

• seizethecheese

  yesterday at 7:37 PM

  Wait, they added this feature that was only on pro models to the non pro ones, seems reasonable to mention?

  • al_borland

    yesterday at 8:04 PM

    If memory serves, it’s only on the ones with the wireless charging case. They get a few quality of life upgrades over the base AirPods, without stepping all the way up to the Pros.

• lvillani

  yesterday at 6:15 PM

  The Pros don't fit my ears even with the smallest ear tips. I definitely welcome bringing that feature to the regular model.

  • anonthrownaway

    yesterday at 6:59 PM

    They make aftermarket tips that are a bit smaller. Still to big for my ears so I switched to the newer "cuff" style and am reasonably happy with them except when I want noise-cancelling.

• jerlam

  yesterday at 6:20 PM

  The swipe controls are terrible on my Pro 2s and make me miss physical buttons like on my ancient Jabra 65t. It's easier to reach into a pocket and push the volume buttons on my phone without unlocking or looking at it.

  • mszcz

    yesterday at 6:28 PM

    Oh man, I loved the 65t! I remember Jabra making great true wireless headphones. They were small, sounded ok, had actual buttons but operating them didn't push the earbud against the brain.

    Miss that a lot. Nowadays it's all touch and I hate it so much because for some reason I have a problem spatially locating them and always end up touching it the wrong way (and yes, I know... ;)

    • mahirsaid

      yesterday at 8:14 PM

      i still use their conference speaker for calling and music and is the primary sound for my computer. i like it and it has worked really well for the last 5 years.

• hbn

  yesterday at 9:07 PM

  They brought a Pro feature to the base model and dropped the price. I don't want Pros because I prefer hard plastic tips.

  They're not doing anything deceptive or clever.

  Cheaper than last gen too.

• bromuro

  yesterday at 6:10 PM

  Actually in the event they presented it exactly like that.

• yesterday at 8:05 PM

• m3kw9

  yesterday at 6:09 PM

  why not? lets not talk about it, people like this gonna say we are highlighting a new feature on a non-pro model

• dbbk

  yesterday at 11:00 PM

  Uh they're literally just saying they brought it down from the Pro to the regular line. I don't know why you're reading too much into it.

• fellowniusmonk

  yesterday at 5:47 PM

  My freebud 5's do that now.

  • dgellow

    yesterday at 6:13 PM

    Pretty sure I had something like that on galaxy buds 6+ years ago

    • stonogo

      yesterday at 6:45 PM

      Been a feature on Bose QC earbuds for a long time too

  • crossroadsguy

    yesterday at 6:59 PM

    But is that an Apple? If not, then how is that good?

  • yesterday at 5:54 PM

• mpalmer

  yesterday at 7:59 PM

  "For users who want even more"

• xattt

  yesterday at 6:20 PM

  > … apple selling volume up and down as it were some fantastical feature and not have been present in air pods pro since god nows when.

  I’ve been having to throw away my earphones and getting new ones whenever I needed a new volume setting. Going up and down in the same device is truly a game changer.

  /s

• Fervicus

  yesterday at 6:04 PM

  Come on, it's their best AirPod yet!

  • accrual

    yesterday at 6:49 PM

    I know it's silly but I enjoy listening for the "this is our X-est Y yet" during these events. It's incremental improvements I enjoy, but it's like a mini trope for me.

• MBCook

  yesterday at 5:51 PM

  Translation: “We took a pro thing and put it on the non-pros. Money please.”

  • dijit

    yesterday at 6:02 PM

    for those who were holding out from Gen1 or whatever, adding pro features at a non-pro price is definitely incentivising. I’m not sure why we’re pretending it’s not.

    Would you rather have generation old Pros or brand new standard airpods which have the pro features you actually want.

    • daseiner1

      yesterday at 6:15 PM

      apple has been quite good at treating their "economy" products with the same level of respect as their premium ones, as far as I've experienced. the Neo is significantly more powerful than the Pro I bought four years ago and $100 cheaper, pre-inflation accounting. A brand like Apple introducing a highly-capable "discount" product goes against all common sensibilities for a company whose branding is anchored on prestige. Plus the extended support window for older devices vs. their competitors in the smartphone space.

      • Gigachad

        today at 4:17 AM

        Apples budget stuff is weirdly good right now. Other brands would have released the neo as a plastic frame bit of ewaste loaded with adware.

    • MBCook

      yesterday at 6:06 PM

      I think it’s nice and I think they covered it right in the video.

      Do you want open ear (AirPods) or closed (AirPods Pro).

      Some people can’t stand having something in their ear. The volume control is a nice feature to have and now it’s available on the cheaper ones. I’ve missed it on my 4s.

      Yeah the marketing copy is marketing copy and Apple never references competitors. But if you like the non-pros it’s a nice upgrade.

      • accrual

        yesterday at 6:53 PM

        > Do you want open ear (AirPods) or closed (AirPods Pro).

        I'm holding out for the next Pro model as I genuinely benefit from closed headphones/earbuds. Open is nice in a controlled environment but I'd rather have that slight seal when I'm somewhere noisy.

        My Pro 2s are genuinely very comfortable and still work great after 2+ years of moderate use, so haven't felt a need to upgrade to Pro 3 yet. I use aftermarket foam-like tips and find they seal great FWIW.

      • coldtea

        yesterday at 6:16 PM

        >Do you want open ear (AirPods) or closed (AirPods Pro). Some people can’t stand having something in their ear.*

        Both versions put something in your ear.

        There are wireless earbuds that stay outside next to the ear, that are actually the ones legitimately called "open ear", but the AirPods aren't that type.

        • syncsynchalt

          yesterday at 8:47 PM

          They mean isolating vs non-isolating.

          Airpods Pro are isolating, Airpods are not.

        • MBCook

          yesterday at 6:18 PM

          It’s confined to the assumption you already want AirPods.

          Apple isn’t going to mention things they don’t sell.

    • coldtea

      yesterday at 6:14 PM

      >for those who were holding out from Gen1 or whatever, adding pro features at a non-pro price is definitely incentivising. I’m not sure why we’re pretending it’s not.

      Because it's a non-feature even the cheapest $30 wireless earbuds have had since forever, often even better, like with physical buttons.

      • joemi

        yesterday at 7:31 PM

        So what are you saying? Because there are cheaper earbuds made by someone else with this feature, Apple _shouldn't_ add it to their earbuds? I'm not sure why that would be the case.

  • robotresearcher

    yesterday at 8:16 PM

    See also:

    Power steering

    Jet engines

    Anesthetics

    Rubber tires

    Flat screen TVs

    How grubby of them to take a high end feature and make it more affordable.

  • s3p

    yesterday at 6:03 PM

    *Less money please.

• creaturemachine

  yesterday at 5:51 PM

  The marketing kool-aid must flow. Many other earbuds have swipe volume, but because they aren't open-ear Apple gets to claim this amazing breakthrough.

• pkulak

  yesterday at 6:10 PM

  Of all the marketing to complain about, this seems super tame. Wait until you see "gluten-free tortilla chips" at the supermarket. :D

  • KyleTheDev

    yesterday at 6:14 PM

    As somebody w/ Celiac, you'd be surprised. Many a time I've been poisoned by normal gluten free things being tainted by poor manufacturing lines, or companies mixing in other product. Tortilla chips with gluten, Hashbrowns/Potatoes coated with wheat flour, so many things are made not-gluten-free for no reason.

    • giglamesh

      yesterday at 7:19 PM

      There is always a reason and it usually has something to do with money. We really need to find a cure for Celiac 'cuz wheat is just too ingrained in our culture to be removed. (pun not intended, but also not removed so...)

  • newguytony

    yesterday at 6:16 PM

    Some brands use wheat to make the chips more crunchy. Just like IHOP puts wheat in their scrambled eggs. McDonald's uses wheat in their french fries. They stick wheat everywhere.

  • rafram

    yesterday at 8:15 PM

    There are tortilla chips that do contain gluten, or are cross-contaminated with it. A gluten-free label means they guarantee <20ppm gluten in the product. That’s useful info!

I recently upgraded from my Airpods Pro to the Huawei Freebuds Pro 5. Audio quality, battery life, noice cancelling, and especially microphone quality is so much better! And they work nicely with Android, Windows and MacOS. I would 100% recommend them to anyone over any other Earbuds, at 160€ they are also not amongst the more expensive models.

Interesting on the pricing. You now get some of the best AirPod features all in $129. In Apple's pricing that is cheap.

On the other hand in the past few years I have noticed a lot of people wearing Sony's Wireless headset and Earphones. Apple used to dominate this category when they first launch AirPods. I am wondering what happened they people discovered they could use other brand and Apple's brand loyalty don't quite work.

• ghostly_s

  yesterday at 6:51 PM

  Apple's product has never been near the top in ergonomics nor sound quality, there's no big mystery. The UX and the ANC were their differentiator but the competition has largely closed that gap.

• alpineman

  today at 7:55 AM

  $129*

  *without a case

Extend the Stem!!

I have no idea why Apple has made AirPods harder to handle, impaired mic placement, and limited the battery capacity with shorter stems.

The longer stems offered more room for battery, got the mic closer to your mouth, and were so much easier to handle, manipulate etc.

Can't really fathom why they shortened the stem and made it harder for everyone, themselves and users alike.

• jandrewrogers

  yesterday at 7:07 PM

  I assume the long stem increases the likelihood it will be dislodged from the ear because it increases torque at the point of contact when moving. The first AirPods were much less secure in the ear than current ones. Reducing stem length may lower the risk of them falling out.

  The long stem may have been a necessary but suboptimal engineering tradeoff to get the first version out the door. A lot of design tweaks have gone into making AirPods less likely to fall out.

  • spbaar

    yesterday at 9:19 PM

    The first airprods were so loose in the ear I thought the entire world was playing a prank on me when I tried them out.

  • mft_

    yesterday at 10:14 PM

    This must be a personal preference based on ear anatomy.

    The first-gen Airpods fit my ears perfectly, and were secure. When I lost them and upgraded to the 2nd gen, I was initially upset - aside from the body being fatter (and so less comfortable in my ears) they were very insecure - I couldn't even walk around without them loosening and dislodging.

    I was on the point of returning them when I saw the advice online to 'twist' them into a different position. I now use them with the stalks horizontal, and they're secure. Still a touch less comfortable than the v1s, but easily tolerable.

  • cco

    yesterday at 11:52 PM

    My experience is the exact opposite. The new shape fits less well in my ear, hopefully they've chosen the best shape for most people, but the shorter stem provides no third point of contact like the old ones!

    The longer stem used to have a better chance at contacting your face for some staying power. The shorter stems don't.

  • philistine

    yesterday at 10:11 PM

    The long stems were literally the same length as on their wired headphones. They encased a bluetooth antenna and battery inside their existing design.

• afavour

  yesterday at 5:56 PM

  Personally I prefer it. Less chance of accidentally knocking them out.

• cush

  today at 5:42 AM

  Ew no. Long stem AirPods look goofy

• cj

  yesterday at 5:48 PM

  Aesthetics. Short stem looks sleeker.

  Form vs. function

  • cco

    yesterday at 5:57 PM

    Do they? I don't think so. Makes them look stubby and more like a hearing assistive device (not particularly fashionable).

    They looked sleeker and more balanced with the longer stem and in the ear more like jewelry.

  • s3r3nity

    yesterday at 5:52 PM

    Or, you know, design trade-offs like every other hardware ever made.

    I don't want to feel like I'm wearing one of those customer support head mics. I'm ok with shorter stem, and never had a problem.

    • throwup238

      yesterday at 5:58 PM

      > Or, you know, design trade-offs like every other hardware ever made.

      Or different SKUs. Just saying.

      Not that hard for the most profitable trillion dollar company on the planet.

    • stackghost

      yesterday at 5:58 PM

      Apple are king of form over function. Have we already forgotten that hack Jony Ive and his fetish for removing usefulness in favor of a few mm of thinness? Or the stupid fucking Touch Bar keyboard?

      I still have a touch bar MacBook and the keyboard is unusable now.

      • grvbck

        yesterday at 7:14 PM

        The touch bar was not a bad invention. Apple just neglected it and never gave it the software support it deserved. With some proper development it could have been great.

        • bigyabai

          yesterday at 7:32 PM

          The touch bar was a terrible invention. Apple had no shortage of money to fix the software side, they just recognized that it wasn't a "Pro" feature.

          Consider the most basic usage of the touch bar, displaying function keys. The tactile feedback of a physical function row enables most people to touch-type the function keys from home row. For IDEs, NLE/DAW workflows, UNIX terminal setups and cross-platform software, the touch bar had nothing to offer but downsides. And even in apps that supported it, there was no unified mnemonic standard that enabled you to use the touch bar strip without looking away from the monitor and losing sight of your content. Apps that copied the content into the touch bar were even more hilariously cornered into bad UX, displaying a postage stamp-sized status for whatever you're working on.

          The common defense of the touch bar says it needed hardware reworks and greenfield HID architectures to succeed. But I think Apple realized it was a totally flawed concept, and iterated on it internally to the point that they realized it was a sunken cost fallacy.

          • PlunderBunny

            yesterday at 9:58 PM

            I’m sure I’m not the only programmer that developed a habit of resting my finger on the F5 key at a certain point in my workflow, and then had to unlearn it just because of the stupid touch-bar (Still using my 2019 Intel MBP with stupid touch-bar).

  • raverbashing

    yesterday at 6:14 PM

    Honestly the stems always looked kinda dorky to me

• ksec

  yesterday at 6:41 PM

  >Extend the Stem!!

  Same thought as well. It doesn't have to be much bigger, but even 10% longer would be much more useful from mic placement and battery perspective.

• flyinglizard

  yesterday at 7:53 PM

  Longer stem means bigger case. The case on the Pro is nice, the regular one not so much.

  • yesterday at 8:20 PM

• naravara

  yesterday at 8:08 PM

  I really miss the BeatsX headphones where it’s 2 earbuds attached to each other with a flexible cable that drapes over the back of your neck. It was nice to be able to take my headphones out without needing to hold them and they just fall over my shoulders like a necklace. Also means not having to keep track of a third item since there’s no charging case. And the whole thing is soft and flexible so you can put it more easily in your pocket without it bulging like the AirPods in a case do.

  I find the “true wireless” form factor finnicky and comically easy to lose and easy to drop. I don’t really see much utility in it either aside from the cool technology flex. If they’d put the modern audio quality and noise cancelling on the BeatsX (and the more neutral AirPods response curve) I’d be first in line.

• loloquwowndueo

  yesterday at 5:48 PM

  It’s Apple so the answer is clear: shorter stems look nicer. Functionality be damned. You’re holding it wrong my dude. Nobody wants to look like they have q-tips in their ears.

  • euroderf

    yesterday at 5:49 PM

    So fade the stem to dark grey already.

    • loloquwowndueo

      yesterday at 5:51 PM

      Dirty q tips? Eww :)

  • yesterday at 5:58 PM

  • longbrass

    yesterday at 5:50 PM

    The smaller the form factor, the closer they are to functional implants.

  • embedding-shape

    yesterday at 5:51 PM

    Also each device has to be identifiably different by at least some small margin, so the people who care about measuring worth/value based on the latest devices and similar trash can reject people based on what they "wear", pushing up device sales.

I have extremely weird ear canals and no, I mean absolutely NO in-ear earbuds will stay in my ears for longer than 15 minutes, even with the christmas tree earplug-style tips on them. For that reason I am relegated to either my bulky but beloved Sennheiser WH1000XM4 headphones (or, even less practical: my wired planar magnetics) or... airpods 3. Somehow despite trying every brand of "not-in-ear-ear-bud" a-la Airpods/Earpods I have found absolutely nothing that has the frequency response of Apple's design. The fidelity is nothing to write home about but I'm not missing any of the music. Even well-regarded "flathead" earbuds, conversely, simply have no response whatsoever below 120hz.

• m4ck_

  yesterday at 11:57 PM

  Not trying to convince your anything, just putting it out there for those that are plagued by this, but I had similar issues and memory foam tips solved this for me with airpods. For me they'll stay in if i'm basically motionless, but as soon as I move they're on the run.. With the foam tips I'm able to do basically anything and not worry about losing an expensive earbud.

  I'm afraid to try expensive over the ear headphones again after a pair of XM3's started making the most hideous screeching noise right after the warranty expired.

  • aqme28

    today at 9:18 AM

    Yes, same. But these ones don't have eartips, so we are going to have to wait for the Pro version if we want these.

  • Catagris

    today at 7:29 AM

    Are the memory foam tips first party? Which ones did you get?

• hexfish

  yesterday at 9:24 PM

  Sony.

  • pokstad

    yesterday at 11:13 PM

    Sony LinkBuds Fit

    • simlevesque

      yesterday at 11:50 PM

      The comment you're replying to means that Sony made the XM4, not Sennheiser like the parent said.

• atombender

  today at 2:33 AM

  Like you, I have weird ear canals, and I've always struggled with fit; the Apple ones are the worst.

  I have the Sony earbuds, and while I agree they fit a little better, I find the memory foam disgusting. It also degrades over time and becomes brittle. My solution was the Alza SednaEarfit Max, which are silicone earbud tips that fit the Sony. They are easy to clean and come with the tiny mesh that prevents ear wax from getting into the electronic part of the earbud. Of all the tips I've tried, these stay the best.

  However, they still fall out too easily if I'm eating (from jaw movements) or lying on my side.

  PS. You mean Sony WH1000MX4. Not Sennheiser. Although Sennheiser makes the Momentum True Wireless, which comes with silicone earbud tips.

• lukas099

  yesterday at 9:25 PM

  What about IEMs with custom earmolds?

$30 cheaper is a surprise for sure. Especially in this economy.

• Flavius

  yesterday at 6:18 PM

  Too much competition from China. They would have bumped the price if it wasn't for the cheap alternatives from every Chinese manufacturer.

  • mrheosuper

    today at 2:11 AM

    Are there any competition ? There is cheaper TWS with comparable sound quality, but airpod comes with whole set of features, like transparent switching between devices, or Find My network, or charging case has buzzer for easy finding.

  • theshrike79

    yesterday at 9:01 PM

    Which Chinese alternatives are available with similar quality in ANC, sound quality and fit? Like actual brands I can buy today, not the kind that has a brand name that was created by someone rolling their head on the keyboard and won't exist in 6 months.

    • f33d5173

      today at 12:37 AM

      Idk if soundcore is the same quality but it's pretty good and half the price of the base airpods. Hard to justify paying twice as much and not getting any ANC.

    • rtpg

      today at 1:45 AM

      Sony's WF-C510s are $70. The APPs are one thing but the base airpods I never really found to be that amazing quality-wise.

      The linkbud S's are comparable in pricing tho

    • en4bz

      yesterday at 10:06 PM

      Moondrop pudding

      • bel8

        today at 6:35 AM

        dam I'll have to try that one

      • shimman

        today at 3:29 AM

        Wow looks very good. I will say I've been highly impressed by Chinese consumer electronics they are often high quality, have many features, and usually are cheap.

Saying the battery life is extended to 22 hours with the battery case is a bit absurd- you have to still take them out and charge them. I’m not sure why we can’t have wires that connect to the AirPods and charge while listening. The battery life will always be the biggest drawback of bt headphones.

• bl4kers

  today at 9:03 AM

  It's really not that hard. The Galaxy Buds Plus from 2020 get 11 hours of battery on a single charge. Same for the Sony WF-C510 that are $70

• visarga

  today at 8:00 AM

  When they get down to 10% put one in the case, by the time your other bug gets to 1% you changed the first one. No gaps

• jonwinstanley

  yesterday at 9:16 PM

  Really?

> Powered by Apple Intelligence, Live Translation on AirPods 5 breaks down barriers by letting users communicate across languages.

Thing that only happens in the minds of SV marketing gurus.

I wish they would expand their live translation support more rapidly for other languages. Waiting patiently for Thai support

> For users who want even more, AirPods 5 with Wireless Charging Case add longer battery life and on-stem volume control for $149

This is a weird product feature versioning. Would people pay an extra $20 for these two features specifically? With the AirPods 4 the upsell SKU was ANC which made exponentially more sense.

• DanHulton

  yesterday at 11:21 PM

  15% more price for 25% more battery is worth it alone. Add in that every time I adjust the volume without needing to dig out my phone, and I’ll feel even better.

  $20 is a single meal at a fast food restaurant, which I’ll have forgotten about the very next day. This is a much better long term investment.

• MDTHLN

  yesterday at 6:35 PM

  I would pay for the stem volume controls alone.

  I prefer the regular AirPods to in-ear. But I still keep an old pair of Pro's around purely because the stem is so convenient for changing volume when I'm walking the dog or out for a run and I'd rather not get my phone out my pocket.

  • Vachyas

    yesterday at 11:47 PM

    FWIW being able to effortlessly change volume with the watch dial is like 20% of my reason for wearing one.

• pampas

  yesterday at 10:10 PM

  I'd happily buy the older versions for less. Which is why they don't allow that.

• fckgw

  yesterday at 6:10 PM

  The differentiating feature is the Wireless Charging case, which they've had a separate SKU for forever.

• K7PJP

  yesterday at 7:02 PM

  I bought the AirPods 4 with ANC in large part due to the Wireless Charging Case.

• naravara

  yesterday at 8:11 PM

  These things have usable lifespans of about 2-4 years before the batteries start to go (depending on how low a capacity you can tolerate). It’s more like you buy the one available at the time when your old ones wear out.

  • the_gastropod

    yesterday at 10:52 PM

    I don’t know if I just got lucky or what. But my AirPods Pro (1st gen) just finally crapped out last week. And the batteries are mostly fine: the speaker blew out in the right one, and it now sounds awful. But that’s ~6-7 good years that I got out of ‘em.

• m3kw9

  yesterday at 6:11 PM

  ^ knocking it before anyone on earth tried it- minus apple

  • minimaxir

    yesterday at 6:12 PM

    Both of these features have been on existing models (which I've used) for quite awhile and are not unknown quantities.

I don't understand why Apple won't support Aura Cast already.

• crossroadsguy

  yesterday at 8:15 PM

  That might send wrong signals that Apple has started following standard/common specs.

• solarkraft

  yesterday at 8:56 PM

  Back when BLE Audio was first announced, I thought Apple would champion it because it finally extends quality limitations making the microphone quality terrible. I guess they’re content with doing their proprietary thing.

• pyaamb

  yesterday at 8:11 PM

  I would like that. I wonder if its something a software update can enable or not

  • solarkraft

    yesterday at 8:58 PM

    I’d expect their chips to support it by now, but LE Audio, which Auracast is a feature of, requires isochronous streams, a feature of Bluetooth 5.2.

Why do they all sound robotic and sterile? :-/

Let's feel some excitement in your voices!

• bluepeter

  yesterday at 5:52 PM

  For real. I almost think they shouldn't practice, script it, or focus-group it. Just get up there and wing it. Would honestly sound better.

  • russh

    yesterday at 6:11 PM

    I'm stating to think everyone hands are actually AI CGI.

• theshrike79

  yesterday at 9:03 PM

  Because most people outside of the US find fake excitement off-putting and borderline creepy.

The only thing I really want is significantly improved battery life (that could last for an entire flight).

But in the end, it'll be the desire to eradicate the lightning port from my life that forces my hand on the upgrade

• utopiah

  today at 8:59 AM

  Honestly after a while my ears just can't stay earbuds anymore, it's just painful. For long haul flights (over 6hours) I also bring over-ear headphones regardless of battery life.

given the trend, the next airpods pro has to be remarkably different or only 30 usd over the wireless option for the base 5.

A lot of hate for Apple as usual. I love my AirPods. They just works, that's what I need.

• crossroadsguy

  today at 7:28 AM

  Yup. They just works. So satisfying. Now, Apple, shut up and take my money! Actually that is satisfying part. And please make sure I need to pay that money again in a year or two. Thank you. Happy to be an Apple user. Best company.

The positioning of AirPods in the lineup doesn't really make sense to me. Noise canceling works way better with an in-ear fit anyway. Personally, I'd rather see ANC on the Beats Flex. That would create a clearer distinction from the AirPods Pro.

I think the reason they are bringing the normal AirPods close to the features of the AirPods Pro is the next version of AirPods Pro will have tiny forward cameras on the tips allowing visual along with audio AI.

[holding two items at a store] "Siri.. which one of these should I buy"

• uhohherewegoaga

  yesterday at 7:44 PM

  god it feels inevitable but i hate wearable tech including innocuous cameras. first it was the sunglasses that ppl immediately jailbroke to remove the recording indicator. now the possibility of a person seemingly listening to music on the train potentially recording me?

  im just so tired.

• kingkongjaffa

  yesterday at 8:35 PM

  I hope, not I will never buy airpods with cameras.

I wish they would support lossless audio. Like the Sony earbuds do with my Pixel.

This is dirt cheap for Apple. Am I missing something?

• gib444

  today at 8:10 AM

  The $100 iPhone price rises, the $20-40/yr Apple Care for iPhone price rise?

Super annoyed they did not announce a new AirPods Pro or Apple TV. My NVIDIA Shield is getting a bit old (not really an issue unless I want to stream raw 90GB Blu-ray).

A bit strange for Apple to let fairly popular products just go so long without a refresh. Just the vision component of the new AirPods could have been delayed, not really a critical feature anyway.

Apple Watch seems to be getting pretty good, might finally switch away from Garmin if the Apple one is as durable.

I hope they've made the metal contacts inside the case a bit sturdier, because I'm often getting one or both of my AirPods drained to 0% when I take them out of the case, due to contact issues (I assume).

• mulderc

  yesterday at 7:20 PM

  mostly likely you need to clean your case

  • meindnoch

    yesterday at 7:22 PM

    Always do when this happens. I blow into it, and there's no visible dirt on the metal contacts either. Also, a friend of mine also reported the same for their AirPods Pro 2.

    • mulderc

      yesterday at 10:36 PM

      It is pretty hard to see in the case and what I found is even when it looked clean, when I used a tool to dig around a bit there was almost always some gunk in there causing the charging issues.

    • armadyl

      yesterday at 7:30 PM

      Honestly the most frustrating thing about the pros tbh.

have they ever improved the charging system so the charging leads dont get gunked up?

I have a pair of airpod pro 2 and i have to scrape the leads almost every day

would be amazing if they did it thru induction charging (tho i guess thats really slow)

• vachina

  yesterday at 5:52 PM

  Im on my third pair of Airpods pro (replacement courtesy of Apple) and all of them had the ANC partially fail the longer i use them. I wonder why Apple still release new versions of these whem they cant even get the basics right.

  • nxc18

    yesterday at 6:10 PM

    Have you tried replacing your eartips? I find that radically improves performance - I think they must either get clogged or brittle in a way that causes problems.

    Cheap foam eartips from Amazon are even better than stock for my AirPods Pro but they need to be replaced more often.

  • toxik

    yesterday at 6:07 PM

    Yep, I wonder why the ANC socialt is so fragile. Turns me off from buying new ones.

• Toutouxc

  yesterday at 6:06 PM

  I’ve had them for 3,5 years now and off the top of my head I can’t remember where the “charging leads” are. So it’s safe to say that mine definitely don’t get gunked up.

• groos

  yesterday at 5:51 PM

  Is that you, Shrek?

• diroussel

  yesterday at 6:19 PM

  They already do have inductive charging. Both MagSafe, Qi. They even work on the watch charger.

  That’s for all AirPod Pros, and definitely the AirPod 4 with ANC, not sure about other non pros.

  • dylan604

    yesterday at 6:43 PM

    There's definitely versions that do not work with all wireless chargers like the watch charger. Whatever older pair I have do not work with the watch charger

Now's as good a time as ever to ask this question.

I have an iPhone logged in to my iCloud account.

My wife has her iPhone logged in to her own iCloud account.

Both of these iCloud accounts, plus a few more from my kids, make up our "Apple Family" thingy.

My wife bought AirPods. Paired them to her iPhone.

Why oh why every few weeks, when she gets the AirPods from their case, do they automatically connect to my iPhone and steal the audio from my (non-Apple) wireless earbuds I was using?

Do AirPods truly traverse devices based on the fact that separate devices/iCloud accounts are part of a family?

• jwrallie

  today at 7:46 AM

  I have exactly the same setup (two iPhones, a Moondrop Space Travel myself, wife has AirBuds, family account set up so we can buy apps only once). It never happened to us, but it happens frequently between my wife's iPhone and her iPad. I wonder if you have ever connected it to your phone even accidentally, it seems that this is remembered.

• r1chard007

  today at 9:23 AM

  yes, this is annoying. On each device, you have to find the AirPods via the bluetooth settings and tell it to connect "when last connected" instead of "automatically"

How do these compare to the AirPods 4 ANC, I wonder? Hopefully not too much better given that I bought a pair of those about a month ago... :-/

I wonder if they have an automation system which releases these perfectly in time with the video, or if they have some blog boy that has to post them at the right time.

• wmeredith

  yesterday at 6:28 PM

  A manual operation wouldn't shock me at all. A friend used to work on Apple.com and as recently as 5 years ago the product pages were still hard coded. No CMS.

• bob1029

  yesterday at 5:48 PM

  They have multiple fake product "labs" with which to use as sets simply for filming these videos. I am sure one or two FTEs is plausible.

Isn’t Apple expected to release AirPods with cameras in them? Or may be the rumor is they are working on it?

AirPods won't stay in my ears at all (and an ear test practitioner who modeled my ears validated my experience -- he said my ear canals will never hold buds), so it's Shokz forever, for me.

I think I'll stick with my pros. Definitely prefer the rubber tips for ear comfort over the plastic on the standard ones.

• thenthenthen

  today at 2:32 AM

  Ah thats the one of the differences between standard and pro? The plastic ones literally fall/creep out of my ears… without even moving (losing a lot of sound/volume in the process)

Not sure how the public has received them, but I cannot stand to wear the non-pro airpods for more than maybe 40 minutes. They used to give plastic earbuds away with the purchase of a device! I get it, bluetooth vs wired, extra features... but they are super uncomfortable to wear IMO.

The Pros, completely different story. Maybe a bit pricey but the ecosystem, battery life, comfort, ANC, all of that is great. The difference that little rubber piece makes is wild.

Side note - the "directional" audio (Sounds as if it's originating from your device rather than standard L/R audio), not sure if this is still a thing, but it was super weird the first time I tried it. I literally had to check that I was actually using the earbuds a few times, and refused to use it after. Maybe it was TOO good, super cool tech though.

• iknowstuff

  yesterday at 8:38 PM

  Different strokes.

  I'm the opposite, the rubber ones are annoying and give me headaches. Love the open ear feel.

• thefz

  yesterday at 8:32 PM

  > I cannot stand to wear the non-pro airpods

  > The Pros, completely different story

  You think this is accidental?

  • syncsynchalt

    yesterday at 8:51 PM

    They're just covering two ends of the market. I can't stand wearing Pros myself, I can feel the sweat building up in any isolating earbud, and it makes me feel itchy. Would hate for the non-isolating product to disappear.

5 hours of battery life... is a feature they're proud of?

• xquce

  yesterday at 10:06 PM

  Yes. That's alot of battery life for in-ears of that size. Also you add hours more in a 10 min charge from the case. If you have to wear headphones for more than 5 hours straight without a few min break, you have other issues than th technology.

  • ericpauley

    yesterday at 11:38 PM

    Trying to sleep straight through a long haul flight; what’s the issue with that?

I still want them to bring the “tap” operation of the first two generations back. It’s so convenient, for example when wearing them under a beanie in winter. The squeezing and swiping controls aren’t an adequate replacement.

• mulderc

  yesterday at 7:21 PM

  yeah I loved the tap controls. Would be nice to have both available. My guess is that for many people the "tap" wasn't as accurate as apple would like it to be as I had heard lots of complaints about that not working for people when I was available.

No new Pros. They probably saw all the blowback about meta glasses and thought that maybe now's not the time for cameras on things.

• thenthenthen

  today at 2:34 AM

  The Dyson toothbrush seems to think … different

I knew this was going to happen when I purchased my AirPod3s a couple of weeks ago. The only feature I really miss is the touch volume control.

The naming and numbering system for these are now getting annoying. AirPod 3 has the last pro model I guess?

• Vachyas

  yesterday at 11:50 PM

  Confusing enough that I see ads from major retailers mixing it up (or maybe it's on purpose?) listing "Airpods Pro 4" only to click the link and see it's the Airpods 4.

I really hate silicone tip earbuds and the AirPods 4 with ANC were game changing. Having ANC without the silicone tips was just huge for me. It's obviously not as good as having the passive isolation of the silicone as well, but it's plenty good for airplanes and trains.

Are there non-Apple alternatives that also accomplish this?

• gmac

  today at 9:31 AM

  Same here. And I was seriously impressed with how much noise cancelling the v4 can do. I will be seriously impressed again if the v5 is as much better as they claim.

• 100percentjake

  yesterday at 9:20 PM

  I have searched far and wide and have found nothing. I haven't even found a basic-functionality wired earbud that matches the AirPods frequency reproduction.

  • concretebush

    today at 4:17 AM

    try their own cheapo wired earbuds, i use those all the time, no battery, no silicone tip, no bt compression, happiness - they even come with usbc option so they work with the phone, too

I worry about the safety element of this. I'm not sure that having people walking around completely oblivious to their environments is a good thing.

In a multiple of ways: you become disconnected from nature and closed off to environments, and you also reduce safety because you don't know what is going on around you (high % of population live in cities).

Not a uniquely Apple problem though, I suppose.

• utopiah

  today at 9:04 AM

  Indeed not Apple specific.

  That's also why there are different designs, e.g. in ear, over ear, open over ear, bone conduction, and technologies, e.g. noise cancelling, active noise cancelling, non voice filtering.

  Typically there are visuals though, e.g. crossing lights for pedestrian, so the risk from the lack of hearing in a city is quite low IMHO.

  FWIW in Belgium you can even legally ride a bike with earphones, which shows the risk is estimated to be very low.

• matsemann

  yesterday at 8:46 PM

  People drive cars every day, isolated in a box with windows rolled up, playing music or radio, not being able to hear what's going on around them. So I don't buy the safety argument of noise canceling headphones being dangerous.

  • stouset

    yesterday at 8:55 PM

    If we’re going there, cars are a leading cause of death and the leading cause of death for children and young adults.

    That said, the masses have had noise cancelling earbuds for years at this point and while there definitely are cases of people getting hurt or killed from being unaware of their surroundings, it’s not really been that big a deal.

    • juiceland

      yesterday at 8:58 PM

      >cars are a leading cause of death and the leading cause of death for children and young adults.

      Firearms have been the leading cause of death for people ages 1-19 since 2020.

      [0]https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2201761

      • lotsofpulp

        today at 2:08 AM

        I wonder if that stat is true if removing the kids in gangs from the data. One cause of death is relatively undiscerning and applicable to all, but the other cause of death might only apply to a few. But I don’t know, I’d like to see the actual stat.

      • simmschi

        yesterday at 9:57 PM

        In the USA.

      • stouset

        yesterday at 9:19 PM

        How utterly depressing.

  • pipnonsense

    yesterday at 8:53 PM

    Well, that’s exactly why I worry when walking around with noise canceling phones. Because all those people driving cars oblivious to their surroundings

    • matsemann

      yesterday at 9:01 PM

      Yeah, I get your point, I jusr don't think the solution is to police pedestrians. I'll stop wearing noise canceling headphones in the city the day cars stop being loud, and when the drivers of those cars drive with no music and their windows rolled down ;)

• juiceland

  yesterday at 8:57 PM

  >In a multiple of ways: you become disconnected from nature and closed off to environments

  I live in a city. Nature for me means the squealing breaks of cars and trucks + people trying to get my attention so I'll take their religious flyer. No thanks.

• franzb

  yesterday at 8:45 PM

  AirPods and other ANC earphones have been around for ages, nothing new.

• theshrike79

  yesterday at 8:59 PM

  Listening to music while out and about doesn't equate to "completely oblivious".

  I've seen people with no earbuds be completely oblivious and almost walk into traffic...

> best-in-class open‑ear Active Noise Cancellation

Devialet Gemini earbuds are superior: https://www.devialet.com/en-us/true-wireless-earbuds/

Also, they’re French acoustic experts, so cooler and deeper knowledge.

• jbotz

  yesterday at 6:22 PM

  Apples, oranges. Those Devialet look interesting, but aren't "open ear" (they're plugs) and cost twice as much. edit: almost four times as much.

• criddell

  yesterday at 6:48 PM

  Do they pair with Apple devices as easily? If I lose them, can I find them with Find My? Can I use them as hearing aids?

• yesterday at 8:25 PM

• PcChip

  yesterday at 5:58 PM

  how can you say that without having tried both?

• martinky24

  yesterday at 5:56 PM

  source? have you tried airpods 5?

• jamiek88

  today at 1:19 AM

  They don’t look open ear.

Looks like it’s better than AirPod Pro, but cheaper. That’s surprising

Interesting they’re adding ANC, what’s the use case for the Pro now I wonder?

• minimaxir

  yesterday at 5:57 PM

  The AirPods 4 has an ANC option which is weaker than the Pro; this new version just has it baseline and cheaper (and better).

Sennheiser Momentum 5 has user replacable battery which is better for the environment

https://www.ifixit.com/Device/Sennheiser_Momentum_5

• LeoPanthera

  yesterday at 6:43 PM

  Why are you comparing in-ear earbuds to over-ear headphones?

• user19282

  yesterday at 7:50 PM

  The battery on the AirPods is 10 times smaller. So you would have to replace it 10 times to break even.

  • jcgl

    yesterday at 8:42 PM

    Not if the response to the AirPods losing capacity is to replace them altogether.

• asadm

  yesterday at 6:40 PM

  why would I want a replaceable battery? My airpods have been working fine for 6 years now. Isn't THAT better for the environment?

  • acd

    yesterday at 6:48 PM

    You want a replaceable battery because once the battery wears out if the repair is expensive people will throw the used air buds. Used airbuds creates electronic waste ewaste on landfills.

    Not all electronic recycling ä works well some non working electronics are shipped to Africa . The "recycler" takes the profit in the pocket. People have put airtags to track where such electronics to goods end up.

    • asadm

      yesterday at 8:28 PM

      by the time the battery wears out on this one, the speakers are also busted anyway (infact it already is true for mine). So battery replacement isn't an issue for me, the device will be worthless by the time I am done with it.

    • matchbok3

      yesterday at 6:55 PM

      There is no proof that user-replaceable batteries meaningfully reduces e-waste. A lot of tech is upgraded due to obsolete CPUs, etc, not batteries. Plus, batteries last a long time now.

      Also, landfills work really well. Most recycling doesn't work and pollutes more.

      • culi

        yesterday at 7:28 PM

        It is illegal to send e-waste to landfills in California and 22 other states

  • crossroadsguy

    yesterday at 8:18 PM

    True. Also heard one guy in gym was thinking of Apple releasing devices with things like replaceable batteries. He got a heart attack next day. It's very unhealthy what PC is suggesting and yes I agree with you.

• TiredOfLife

  yesterday at 6:42 PM

  Those are some weird looking in ear earphones

• matchbok3

  yesterday at 7:02 PM

  What % of people replace a battery over the lifespan of an item? Does the increased complexity and size of the unit make up for the slightly longer lifespan? What makes it "better" for the environment, exactly when it all ends up in a landfill after 5 years anyway?

I'm always going to be furious at Apple about ceasing large-housing (flat-head) earbuds. My ear canals just don't take in-ear airpods, and there's nothing to be done about it. I've tried everything. What does work is large-housing buds with earclick technology, so they sit against the canal with a decent seal. I used to be able to have mobile ear listening in a way that integrated with apple tech, but there's nothing like airpods that do that anymore. It's just in-ear or big bulky on-ear or over-ear stuff. It's infuriating.

I want a pair of earphones that are as comfortable as the AirPods Pro but have a very solid mic quality.

Whenever I have a call on my AirPods I feel terrible for whoever’s on the other end of my call because the quality is so bad, even when they’re connected to an iPhone. I originally thought I had hardware issues until I heard from others that all AirPods Pro are like this.

I dunno, can someone tell me what I’m missing here?

I have the 4s can’t get them to pair with any other device accept my phone. Oh it pairs but with no sound. No idea why

I found the auto translate thing very funny. Like this woman is some train station in Mexico and after getting an invitation in Spanish to some music event she doesn't even try to say "Gracias".

Like yeah, obviously anyone would understand "Thanks" but come on. Was this part of the discussion of some long meeting? Like if she said a word in Spanish it would imply the Air Pods translate your words?

I'm obviously nitpicking but I just found it oddly funny.

• reaperducer

  yesterday at 7:33 PM

  Like this woman is some train station in Mexico and after getting an invitation in Spanish to some music event she doesn't even try to say "Gracias".

  It was Union Station in Los Angeles, one of the busiest and most iconic train stations in the country.

>The new AirPods 5 were built with the environment in mind

A masterstroke of corporate gaslighting for their disposable product.

• pampas

  yesterday at 10:09 PM

  They're so expensive you won't be buying many and that's great for the environment.

• p0w3n3d

  yesterday at 10:08 PM

  We won't sell you phone with the charger because of... Reasons... I mean...

  Environment

  • webXL

    today at 12:39 AM

    Seems like everyone is doing this now... Sonicare, Norelco... I get the cost cutting + simplifying international packaging aspect. Just pass it on to customers. At least Apple has the other excuse that users might prefer wireless charging, so if users already have that or need to go out and buy it, the included charger just gets thrown in a drawer if it ever makes it out of the box.

Chinese Clones are great and cost $20

With ANC and volume control now available on the basic AirPods what’s the story for the AirPod Pros now? An obsolete product line?

• jghn

  yesterday at 8:16 PM

  I suspect the story is that next year when the AirPods Pro 4s come out it'll be more clear.

Just to mention, saw some people saying Apple was working on AirPods with little cameras in them. Not this time, at least.

A worthy upgrade to a miracle product . Just a couple decades it was a sci-fi fantasy and we all can enjoy it . I get the bible in my ear all night at bed time and books while I work and walk around the property. Great to see the price cut .

• tonymet

  yesterday at 6:51 PM

  Plus fewer distractions.

They teased an AppleCare One Family plan and never explained it. wtf

• havaloc

  yesterday at 9:08 PM

  $49.99 a month, up to six family members (uses previous family sharing system), unlimited devices (with some carve outs for Vision Pro). Limit of six total claims a year seems low until you realize that's every 60 days.

  Available starting September 14th, 2026.

Until they solve the ~250ms latency, which would require replacing bluetooth with a lower latency option, I'm not interested.

Been using the new Siri since June. ChatGPT voice is still superior!

Please Apple let me easily swap out Siri for chatGPT voice! Work together .. buy them or something. Their voice conversation tech is superior and can help save lives when driving!

• MBCook

  yesterday at 5:52 PM

  They’re currently embroiled in a technology theft lawsuit.

  Don’t expect it any time soon.

  • paul7986

    yesterday at 6:10 PM

    Yeah Im aware but it could lead to better integration and or an all out buy out.

    If you have ever used chatGPT voice for directions you could forsee that super intelligent contextual directions are safer then looking at a screen. I.e. "That new mechanic is across the street from the McDonalds on Dorset," in a locale you are familiar with.

So weird they keep saying "Open-ear" and not ear buds. I kept thinking open air headphones which are not the same category.

• rootusrootus

  yesterday at 5:57 PM

  What's a good naming convention? I draw a pretty big distinction between earbuds that seal and earbuds that just sit in front of my ear canal. I have AirPods Pro for when I really need isolation, and regular AirPods for when I need hours of comfortable wearing. "Open-ear earbuds" would make sense to me.

  • ianburrell

    yesterday at 8:07 PM

    Earphones are the ones that sit in the ear, and in-ear headphones or canalphones are ones that go in the ear canal. Earbuds originally meant earphones but now means both kinds.

    Open-ear is more general cause there are ear-hook and clip-on models now.

  • bakies

    today at 12:43 AM

    Oh! These aren't the pro, clearly the naming convention falls short. They do have ANC though. Interesting.

• yesterday at 8:28 PM

Another year of disappointment for me. Airpods gen 1 and 2 were the only buds I could find that fit in my funky ears perfectly. The new shapes just fall right out unless I'm constantly adjusting them. Apple may have found a more universal fit, but I'm not part of their universe.

wrong title, should be AirPods 4

As a huge Apple fan i hate to say this but $20 iems sound better

[dead]

im still bitter they rejected my airprods pro warranty claim because it was a month after they stopped accepting warranty for a known failure mode where the internal mic unglued itself and ruined the ANC.

the apple tech confirmed it had the issue but it was too long outside of their coverage. Like... if it has a known manufacturing defect with a defined timeline, that means i basically rented the damn things.

their only remediation was like 10% off the latest airpods. which is just a massive slap in the face.

are these the airpods with the ai cameras? if so no thanks.

• minimaxir

  yesterday at 6:13 PM

  On Hacker News it's generally good form to read the article before making an informed comment.

Article reads like an ad.

• loloquwowndueo

  yesterday at 5:50 PM

  It’s a press release. Press releases are ads.

  • jojobas

    today at 12:36 AM

    The question is why post ads to Hacker News.

• Jtsummers

  yesterday at 5:52 PM

  > Article reads like an ad.

  You've mistaken a press release for an article. This is Apple's own site and announcement of Apple's own product. Of course it's an ad.

• onlyrealcuzzo

  yesterday at 5:56 PM

  It is an ad...

I can't get over how Apple is getting everyone to refer to them with proper pluralization, ie AirPods 5 vs AirPod 5's.

• macintux

  yesterday at 6:51 PM

  My lone claim to fame, now harder to track down because Twitter decided my lack of activity was somehow suspicious and killed my account, was a brief exchange with Phil Schiller about pluralization of Apple devices.

  > One need never pluralize Apple product names. Ex: Mr. Evans used two iPad Pro devices.

  https://www.iphoneantidote.com/blog/dont-pluralize/

• dylan604

  yesterday at 6:45 PM

  I would never have considered 5's. Are you implying the five is in possession of something?

  • _whiteCaps_

    yesterday at 7:57 PM

    I'm saying that many people do it wrong in other cases, and stick an 's' on the end (or worse, also add an apostrophe). Like surgeon generals, attorney generals, court martials, etc. I'm impressed that people aren't doing it in the case of airpods.

• avree

  yesterday at 6:04 PM

  The first version was "Apple AirPods", there's two of them so it makes sense.

I rock a Redmi ANC earphones because.. they work and theyre like $20. Unlike these overengineered sound makers that breaks the moment you drop them.

• caconym_

  yesterday at 5:53 PM

  > overengineered sound makers that breaks the moment you drop them.

  Which ones are those? I've owned a couple of generations of airpods and dropped them probably hundreds of times (both in the case and out of it) and it has never had any detectable effect on their appearance or functionality. I even had a pair go through the wash and they still mostly worked afterwards (only issue was that the ANC performance was worse and slightly weird).

  • vachina

    yesterday at 5:58 PM

    Yes, on mine (the OG Pros) the ANC would consistently fail. On my second pair the battery refused to charge when i left them in the drawer for too long. Apple replaced them a total of 3 times for all these failures, but i simply stopped wearing them because theyre too unreliable.

    • caconym_

      yesterday at 6:09 PM

      To be fair, I don't expect anything electronic to survive going through the wash unless it has hardcore waterproofing (eg a dive computer). I was pleasantly surprised by the way my airpods kept working.

      I don't remember whether my first airpods were the gen1 pros or the gen2 pros, but you may have been a victim of early teething issues. I don't really have anything negative to say about the ones I've owned.

    • chis

      yesterday at 8:18 PM

      The OG pros honestly sucked and had horrible reliability. The other models have treated me well

• bitexploder

  yesterday at 6:10 PM

  I don't usually defend Apple products, but my AirPods Pro 2nd gen have been rock solid and taken insane abuse. I use them working on cars, runs, hiking, rain, shine, sauna. I drop them. They land in puddles. They smack concrete every couple of months. Sample size 1, but they are probably one of my favorite accessories and things I lug around with me. I use them a lot and if not love /really/ like them and nothing else has come close to the frictionless experience of them.

  Although that may be in part due to vendor lock in and not sharing some of their connection handling API / tech.

• afavour

  yesterday at 5:59 PM

  > Unlike these overengineered sound makers that breaks the moment you drop them.

  You’d do your case favours by not exaggerating. My AirPods have proven perfectly rugged, I’ve dropped them plenty of times.

  • vachina

    yesterday at 6:06 PM

    Not exaggerating. My daily drives are Apple products except for Airpods, and I will always single them out because (in my experience) they’re that bad.

• loloquwowndueo

  yesterday at 5:50 PM

  Dunno man, I bought a cheap set once and they were abysmal, I hated them so much I just destroyed them in a rage when they started malfunctioning yet again. I got AirPods and haven’t looked back, they just work all the time. Granted I’ve never dropped them :)

  • rootusrootus

    yesterday at 5:53 PM

    > Granted I’ve never dropped them :)

    You would be fine then, too. My daughter makes a sport out of how often she can drop airpods and even put them through the wash. She's on the hook for buying her own pair next time but the old ones keep on working.

  • vachina

    yesterday at 5:53 PM

    I guess i lucked out with Redmi (specifically a Redmi Bud 6 lite). They just wont fail.

• junble

  today at 9:08 AM

  [dead]