\

Zohran and the Short Link

153 points - yesterday at 11:50 PM

Source
  • jancsika

    today at 3:47 AM

    > click-to-cancel combat-antisemitism EndStreetHarassment jingle knicks knicksgame3 rental-ripoff Summer

    I'd like to believe that the diversity, equity, and inclusion of Scheme, Pascal, and C stdlib naming conventions here is intentional.

      • fny

        today at 4:33 AM

        Flame wars. City council will soon debate two vs four spaces between traffic cones.

    • cosmic_cheese

      today at 1:47 AM

      This makes a lot of sense if public participation is actually desired. Links need to be short, snappy, and memorable so they're easy to either type into a smartphone on the spot or be recalled at some point later when one has a spare moment. This kind of link is also more likely to spread via word of mouth.

      Traditional link shorteners only meet one of those requirements. Random strings aren't going to be remembered and the chances that they'll be mistyped is substantially higher.

        • mmooss

          today at 2:11 AM

          At least some traditional link shorterners let you choose the string.

      • lzy

        today at 1:13 AM

        This is similar to Singapore’s https://go.gov.sg links.

        Functions exactly like tinyurl, generally used by public officers for the various programmes/initiatives from the ministries and agencies.

          • NSPG911

            today at 1:17 AM

            it would be nice if they added a link preview

            not sure why they have never done that before

        • thoughtpeddler

          today at 5:09 AM

          The meta on this post is that the minimalist blog design by iamwillwang.com is itself really cool. Great work!

          • gravypod

            today at 12:29 AM

            People are discovering go links from first principles.

            • SwellJoe

              today at 12:31 AM

              Given how untrustworthy the most popular social media providers have proven to be, it's madness that so many politicians and government accounts still use things like Xitter or facebook as their primary communication medium.

              Even ignoring the political misinformation that is rampant on these platforms and often promoted widely by the platform because it is inflammatory and gets lots of engagement, they also severely punish posts that link away from the site, which public safety and government accounts obviously need to do. It's a hazard for public safety info to be targeted primarily at a feed designed to bury it. Even if you're following those accounts on Xitter or facebook, they're effectively never going to show you their posts.

                • toomuchtodo

                  today at 2:12 AM

                  https://bsky.app/profile/mayor.nyc.gov

                    • zhivota

                      today at 3:56 AM

                      A little sad that it's often posting screenshots of X posts there. At least the screenshot has alt text, but if you're doing alt text, why a screenshot in the first place?

                      • SwellJoe

                        today at 3:06 AM

                        As I understand it, Bsky doesn't punish posts for including a link off-site, and doesn't require you to be logged in to view it. Whether they'll continue to behave in a responsible way forever remains to be seen, I guess.

                          • radicalriddler

                            today at 3:30 AM

                            The great thing about Bsky is that feeds can be user-run (and the for you feed is a great success story). So if Bluesky Inc. wants to derank links on their discover feed, there are a lot of user driven feed options to counteract that

                              • toomuchtodo

                                today at 3:37 AM

                                NYC could also pipe their own PDS right into NYC mobile apps, email notifications, etc. in this context.

                • ewwe

                  today at 12:28 AM

                  Mamdani+ his team are genius at PR

                    • markdown

                      today at 3:54 AM

                      In an age where cameras are everywhere, all one has to do for good PR is good.

                        • inigyou

                          today at 5:28 AM

                          Only if you own the camera system, otherwise they won't publish the video of you doing good

                      • hackernud3s

                        today at 4:30 AM

                        It's an url shortener. I implemented 3 of these this year and nobody is calling me a genius.

                          • chromehearts

                            today at 5:31 AM

                            Because a genius would have only needed to implement a single one this year

                    • today at 12:32 AM

                      • amazingamazing

                        today at 12:55 AM

                        I like click to cancel. Should have a year at least in url

                        • micromacrofoot

                          today at 12:19 AM

                          this is how the government should communicate with its people - push out via all social media channels but always link back to something everyone can access!

                          hopefully this stuff gets pushed out via email too? not enough open protocols to receive pushes from otherwise

                            • jachee

                              today at 12:32 AM

                              What if I told you there’s an existing protocol for doing Really Simple Syndication?

                                • tadfisher

                                  today at 12:38 AM

                                  Sorry, we're on the wrong timeline. The worse one, in fact.

                          • kevitivity

                            today at 12:36 AM

                            [flagged]

                              • sanid

                                today at 1:03 AM

                                Your comment adds literally nothing to this discussion. You can't form an opinion on the topic discussed because of your opinion on someones politics. Great, don't comment.

                                • Aboutplants

                                  today at 12:51 AM

                                  What specific policies do you disagree with out of curiosity

                                    • arijun

                                      today at 4:43 AM

                                      I'm not from NYC (nor do I have the same difficulty seeing past politics that gp seems to have), so I didn't research this stuff so closely. But from what I saw, it seemed that a lot of his policies seemed populist.

                                      - Rent freezes do not seem to work. When he ran on that position I did look up briefly to see if there was any recent publications that reversed the previous consensus that they don't work, but didn't find much.

                                      - State run stores are pretty bad at their jobs. Someone on here mentioned state run liquor stores as an example of where state run stores work, but in my experience, they are the opposite. I suspect that the store will work well for the first several years, while there is a lot of media attention on it, but when it falls from the foreground, the oversight will slacken and it will go the way of many other of these projects.

                                      - I am not an expert but I suspect the wealth tax won't work the way they hope.

                                      On the other hand, the attention that he's bringing to issues that were previously swept under the rug (like transportation) is great, and the way he energizes the populace is amazing.

                                        • inigyou

                                          today at 5:29 AM

                                          So far everything they're doing is working out how they said it would

                                      • klipt

                                        today at 1:43 AM

                                        Government subsidized groceries seems like something that was already solved by food stamps. Having the government run entire grocery stores at a loss seems like a worse implementation of the same thing.

                                        I guess it's nice for the voters who are too rich to qualify for food stamps, but in that case it would have been equivalent and simpler to just make the food stamps more universal (remove means testing).

                                        If you really want something different to food stamps, India's subsidized canteens seem like a much more interesting idea: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/inside-indias...

                                          • mardifoufs

                                            today at 2:11 AM

                                            Isn't the issue a lack of grocery stores in those areas? How would food stamps help with that? The issue isn't really affordability but rather absence of stores. It might not be profitable to run a store there but that's the point of a city run store in this case.

                                            • the_gastropod

                                              today at 1:52 AM

                                              I have my suspicions about what’s going to happen. I worry the demand is going to be too high to realistically deal with. But dammit am I excited to see someone try something a bit different to address a very obvious need.

                                              State-run stores aren’t really that special. A bunch of states have state-run liquor stores. The military runs commissaries. These don’t elicit much fear-mongering or attention on cable news for some reason.

                                                • klipt

                                                  today at 1:57 AM

                                                  Exactly what problem does it solve that food stamps cannot solve more simply?

                                                    • bakies

                                                      today at 2:15 AM

                                                      It's not discounted groceries. It's stores in food deserts.

                                                      • the_gastropod

                                                        today at 2:56 AM

                                                        Respectfully, maybe spend 5 minutes reading about it from the horse’s mouth. The Mamdani admin has done a pretty good job, imo, of laying out the case, and explaining the plan for these 5 grocery stores.

                                                        https://www.nyc.gov/mayors-office/news/2026/07/mayor-mamdani...

                                        • livinglist

                                          today at 12:55 AM

                                          At this point I care more about decency than politics.

                                            • inigyou

                                              today at 5:30 AM

                                              Decency is politics

                                          • the_gastropod

                                            today at 12:59 AM

                                            Go on, dawg! Be specific!

                                            • mjmsmith

                                              today at 12:46 AM

                                              It's ok to keep our personal problems to ourselves.

                                          • GauntletWizard

                                            today at 12:32 AM

                                            The problem with these short pithy urls is that their lifetime is limited - there's only so many initiative names and they're going to collide and be removed and replaced.

                                            Cool uris don't change[1]. Short, readable uris are great but they should be merely redirecs, and the mapping should be version controlled and exposed to the public as an immutable history.

                                            [1] https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI

                                              • inigyou

                                                today at 5:31 AM

                                                The internet isn't an append-only archive. It changes quite frequently in fact. Sorry dawg.

                                                • bastawhiz

                                                  today at 3:53 AM

                                                  The public doesn't need an immutable history of URLs, they need URLs they can freaking type. When you've got pages people actually care to go to, then you can create your museum of URLs.

                                                  • schrodinger

                                                    today at 3:29 AM

                                                    Easily solved by adding an interstitial whenever a URI becomes replaced and is therefore no longer immutable, and showing the history of what it used to point to as well (in case you're coming along from an old link). By default, after 5 seconds, it could redirect to the current destination.

                                                    • pavo-etc

                                                      today at 12:55 AM

                                                      Luckily these are merely redirects!

                                                      • markdown

                                                        today at 1:14 AM

                                                        Brings to mind this: https://x.com/NYCMayor/status/1971618033115550180

                                                        • stonogo

                                                          today at 1:50 AM

                                                          The lifetime of the programs they link to is also limited. There's no earthly reason, when running a website in 2026, to care what Tim Berners-Lee thought about the aesthetics and purposes of URLs in 1998. It's a nice nostalgia session, but "cool urls don't change" is ironically short-sighted and has lead to well-meaning dolts embedding GUIDs and other such constructs into them. The entire concept was posited prior to the advent of on-screen phone keyboards, which make typing long heavily-punctuated urls a pain in the ass. There are a thousand reasons to salute this document and let it recede into the mists of time.

                                                          A municipal website should be useful to the citizens who want to use it. This is a great example of doing something useful with the web.

                                                      • slopinthebag

                                                        today at 12:42 AM

                                                        This seems so amateur hour. The way the links work in this post are broken on mobile, and the first one I managed to make work was full of trivial grammatical errors.

                                                          • bakies

                                                            today at 12:55 AM

                                                            Works on my machine. Didn't see any grammar errors.

                                                              • slopinthebag

                                                                today at 1:07 AM

                                                                [flagged]

                                                                  • anigbrowl

                                                                    today at 1:57 AM

                                                                    You didn't even specify which link had the errors; 'the first one I managed to make work' is something known only to you. Complaining about a problem while not providing any hints on how to reproduce it is not a great way to win friends and influence people.

                                                                    • bix6

                                                                      today at 1:10 AM

                                                                      Tap and tap again. Works for me. Also not seeing grammar errors…

                                                          • jimmydoe

                                                            today at 12:30 AM

                                                            does it matter?

                                                            big tech has long canceled url on phones.

                                                              • today at 12:35 AM

                                                                • api

                                                                  today at 12:37 AM

                                                                  I can type a URL on today's iPhone just fine.

                                                              • WarmWash

                                                                today at 1:35 AM

                                                                I'm not a huge fan of Zohran, but man, I will admit that it is so refreshing to have a leader that isn't senile and is actually in touch.

                                                                  • spiderfarmer

                                                                    today at 4:42 AM

                                                                    Just admit you’re a fan. No shame in that.