Ask HN: Is this normal HN ranking?
4 points - today at 4:07 AM
I came back looking for a TechCrunch story about SV undermining democracy [0], and was surprised to find it had already dropped off the front page.
Found it on page 2, but it's ranking was lower (44) than articles that it should seemingly outrankโbased on comments (211), points (247) and time posted (12 hours ago). See screenshot [1].
For instance, at 38 is an older article with only 3 comments and 29 points.
At 41 was a significantly older article with only 38 comments and 125 points.
So, this article is ranking lower than even a much older article with roughly half the votes and ~5.5x fewer comments.
Is there some other "bonus" or penalty for articles (beyond those that are overtly problematic per HN guidelines)?
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232221
[1] https://imgur.com/a/t4Cn2Fi
Comments reduce a post's ranking.
Huh? Why?
I've always suspected it's an attempt to defuse flame wars, with the expectation that a lot of comments means a post is highly controversial and stirring up arguments in the comments section.
Marvin_RunAI
today at 4:49 AM
Wondering about this as well.