\

Turn satellite imagery into a paper globe you fold yourself

68 points - today at 2:57 AM

Source
  • Max-q

    today at 5:34 AM

    Icosahedron is the classic? I have never ever seen an icosahedron globe in my life, neither real or digital. What in the world happened in the brain or artificial neural network when that title was picked for an icosahedron “globe”?

  • hahahaa

    today at 3:53 AM

    6.95 or point my LLM at the site and copy the simple idea.

      • olek1983

        today at 9:25 AM

        Almost every idea is copyable. Digital ideas are even easier to copy.

        Here's the antidote: https://kevinkelly.substack.com/p/better-than-free

        • soupspaces

          today at 7:24 AM

          Decades spent building tools to freely copy and fork each other’s code, only to arrive at a future where people pay tokens to do the same thing with added noise. Progress.

            • hahahaa

              today at 9:22 AM

              Well you can still freely copy free software.

          • slurppoop

            today at 6:52 AM

            Definitely not an unethical thought cause this is 100% vibe-coded. https://mapscaping.com/podcast/i-have-been-making-ai-slop-an...

        • ShinyLeftPad

          today at 9:45 AM

          > No pins yet — your globe works fine without them, but a “you are here” makes it a gift.

          (in exasperation) How does that make it a gift?

          • mkurz

            today at 9:08 AM

            Now that we have foldable phones, is there a (round) digital globe (like the classic ones) which I can control with an app and for example show me the current world map with "live" weather and all flights from flight radar? If such a globe would exist I would buy one even for a couple of thousand dollars. Just to have all kinds of "live" maps directly in front of me on my desk.

            • pimlottc

              today at 4:35 AM

              The icons for the different shapes don’t really make a lot of sense. It’s not really obvious how some of them work and many are quite unlike the actual pattern (which you have to scroll down to see on mobile).

              Also Cahill–Keyes M, which I’ve never heard of or seen before, is described as “the classic M”. That’s not really helpful.

              • AmazingEveryDay

                today at 3:08 AM

                Some interesting comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49093845

                • zkmon

                  today at 8:45 AM

                  Do people still buy .. globes?

                    • srean

                      today at 9:21 AM

                      I see them on sale, so probably they do. However, regardless of whether they do or do not, if they have kids they should. Globes communicate so much better than maps.

                      In fact even better is to build one.

                  • bbor

                    today at 8:33 AM

                    This is pretty great! To the creator(s) if they’re around in here: if you’ve ever dreamed of a smooth, unified transition between the product’s actual scan .svg and the 3D simulation[1], I have some old code[2] for simulating origami paper folding in three.js that could handle this elegantly. It works by drawing faces based on rotating springs at each edge, anchored at two points each and executed in a (hierarchical) procedure.

                    The repo’s in a messy state of primarily-artificial cleanup atm (fml tbh, btw) but it should be trivial to pull out the parts you’d need for a one-off & one-step sim like this.

                    Apologies if obvious lol — it’s getting harder and harder these days to judge that

                    [1] obviously get why you’re not loading 3D on pageload, so worth pointing out that the same might be possible here with a clever .svg<->.ts swap.

                    [2]: https://gitlab.com/doering-ai/apps/origami

                    • monegator

                      today at 5:06 AM

                      neat idea. hate the vibecoded website. Not even changing the default colors.

                      • askvictor

                        today at 8:35 AM

                        This was up a week ago

                        • Snoeprol

                          today at 5:56 AM

                          Website is a bit scuffed on mobile

                          • dango2506

                            today at 2:57 AM

                            [flagged]

                            • JR1427

                              today at 8:39 AM

                              Good on you for creating something fun, but vibing something up and then trying to charge for it, when anyone else could produce the same product for less, is poor taste.

                                • srean

                                  today at 8:48 AM

                                  Why is it poor taste? He is not preventing anyone. Neither is he evergreening patents.

                                  Many things that are on the market can be made and sold by someone else for less.

                                  If you want you can put up a GPL version.