mothballed
today at 9:21 PM
>ou still have to follow building codes
Nope, built my house with no building plans and no code inspections and zero trades licenses, in fact you might be shocked to know I even did the electrical extension / distribution / circuits too all without inspection. My county doesn't believe in all that dumb bullshit that the "public" has the right to decide about victimless regulatory crimes on your own property and if we could overturn the registration law we would, unfortunately the law is a state law that was made mostly by city slickers in the major cities in my state who have no clue places like our rural private road systems exist. Of course the tax collectors know, that's why they were able to put it in there knowing the urban voters wouldn't have occasion to notice though they advertise it as the registration fees going to benefit the public road system.
> murder people
Peacefully riding your unregistered dirt-bike down my private road is compared to a victim-involved crime, how?
> which means all of the tools necessary to ensure a basic level of safety and accountability need to be followed
I can play the safety fuck-fuck game too. The best thing for my safety is that a glorified tax collector who "fears for his life" with a badge and a gun can't stomp his boot on my neighbor cuz he doesn't display the King's numbers on his overpowered illegal e-bike which is far safer for everyone around me than a registered mega-RV where they can't see shit around them. That law wasn't made for safety, it was made for the boot -- if it were about safety they'd exempt most the registration fees for private road operation since there's no public road cost and it would make regulatory compliance more likely. And of course don't get me started on "accountability" as executed by the state -- the state goes out of its way to avoid accountability and any claim of them as protectors of accountability is a hypocritical ruse to evade the fact they're operating under a different incentive.
And nothing about my road is going to jump out and get you. It's in the county record that you're entering a private road and make your big boy choice about whether the unregistered e-bike boogeyman is going to get you. There are signs everywhere warning you you are going on non-county property. This isn't something that makes sense to be subject to democratic control. If "society" wants to make the rules about some victimless regulatory sins on the property they should offer a price and maybe I will sell it to them, or maybe they should use their precious public road system instead that they always claim the private actors can't compete with.
Of course, "society" and their concern for my "safety" and welfare is absolutely nowhere to be found when it's time for me to fix up the roads. Funny that, it was just a one way street. They just want to unload their externalities of faux-public-welfare-nonsense onto private actors.
> This seems perfectly reasonable to me, does it not to you?
In summary, absolutely not. It is not at all consistent with what the "public" is claiming what these laws are for. The public voters are told the laws are going in to protect their publicly owned roads and tax maintained systems. The democratic assent here is a fraud -- they've been baited and switched under the auspices of making laws for publicly owned roads but the politicians took advantage of the fact the urban public had no idea it applied to our road system and those of us who did know aren't a large enough voter pool to stop it when a naive majority is weaponized by politicians in bad faith.
And this gets us back to the fact, that you, lobf, are part of this bait and switch. You didn't have dick to say when Aurornis was advocating they be relegated to private roads. But as soon as I pointed out the law, then suddenly, the goal posts shifted again, and even being on private property isn't good enough. It was never about putting with unregistered vehicles to private property, was it lobf? Because we showed that was a fraud, then your true self emerged, and you revealed it was about stomping on anybody who fails to meet your level of "safety and accountability" even if they confine themselves to 100% private property and everyone is forewarned they are entering private property. Thus the fraud is revealed, the "safety" squad will just keep pushing the issue further, they're not stopping at the goalposts they initially proposed but rather biting off all they can get, even on your own property if you give them an inch they take a mile. Thus all this talk of appealing to what is "reasonable" is just a trap to get others to fall down their slope.