https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/issues/224#issuecomment-38...

It's lovely to see the polite and respectful back and forth in this comment thread where the Iroh folks are talking about deciding to fork. :)

• bigfishrunning

  today at 6:54 PM

  I very much agree, a nice contrast to so much open source drama

  • b_fiive

    today at 7:02 PM

    disclosure: I work on the team behind noq. Can't emphasize enough that the quinn maintainers are really lovely people, and quinn is an excellent project.

The iroh team keeps cooking, unreal.

I’m excited to have a weekend to just sit down and tinker with iroh, it’s been on my list for a while. I want to make an overlay network like nebula with it

iroh seems like a very well positioned product in the era of people rapidly building applications for personal use. I'm really interested in seeing how they continue to grow.

I personally have been looking off and on at providing an "app relay" using it, where people can get an OSS, self-hostable (if desired), zero config way to remotely access their app/data on their network. This would be separate than a "network relay" (a la Tailscale), as this is done selectively as part of the application server and client, requires no knowledge or configuration as the user, and exposes a much smaller surface area.

Love the folks from n0. I regularly use their sendme cli for peer to peer file transfer!

I was just reading the QUIC multipath RFC. Didn't it come out literally yesterday? I guess it's common to have the implementation foreshadowing the RFC but it's jarring to see them back to back like this.

• b_fiive

  today at 7:04 PM

  It's been a draft for a long while, and was only recently approved

[dead]