I guess the next step would be adding support for quantized arithmetic.

• godelski

  today at 9:25 PM

  FYI float is already quantized. It isn't continuous nor infinite. Even the distribution of representable numbers isn't uniform (more dense in [-1,1]).

  • measurablefunc

    today at 10:05 PM

    The standard definition of quantized arithmetic for neural networks is not the same as the one used for floating point or double floating point values in the IEEE standardization of "real" arithmetic: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05877

• pstoll

  today at 5:48 PM

  And the lower precision float variants.

How could this lend insight into why Fast Fourier Transform approximates self-attention?

> Because self-attention can be replaced with FFT for a loss in accuracy and a reduction in kWh [1], I suspect that the Quantum Fourier Transform can also be substituted for attention in LLMs.

[1] "Fnet: Mixing tokens with fourier transforms" (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03824 .. "Google Replaces BERT Self-Attention with Fourier Transform: 92% Accuracy, 7 Times Faster on GPUs" https://syncedreview.com/2021/05/14/deepmind-podracer-tpu-ba...

"Why formalize mathematics – more than catching errors" (2025) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45695541

Can the QFT Quantum Fourier Transform (and IQFT Inverse Quantum Fourier Transform) also be substituted for self-attention in LLMs, and do Lean formalisms provide any insight into how or why?

• wasabi991011

  today at 10:56 PM

  > Because self-attention can be replaced with FFT for a loss in accuracy and a reduction in kWh [1], I suspect that the Quantum Fourier Transform can also be substituted for attention in LLMs.

  Couldn't figure out where you are quoting this from.

  > Can the QFT Quantum Fourier Transform (and IQFT Inverse Quantum Fourier Transform) also be substituted for self-attention in LLMs

  No. The quantum Fourier transform is just a particular factorization of the QFT as run on a quantum computer. It's not any faster if you run it on a classical computer. And to run (part of) LLMs would be more expensive on a quantum computer (because using arbitrary classical data with a quantum computer is expensive).

• gyrovagueGeist

  today at 9:15 PM

  This is just standard Fourier theory of being able to apply dense global convolutions with pointwise operations in frequency space? There’s no mystery here. It’s no different than a more general learnable parameterization of “Efficient Channel Attention (ECA)”

  • godelski

    today at 9:21 PM

      > There’s no mystery here.
    

    Yes and no. Yeah, no mystery because for some reason there's this belief that studying math is useless and by suggesting it's good that you're gatekeeping. But no because there are some deeper and more nuanced questions, but of course there are because for some reason we are proud of our black boxes and act like there's no other way