\

Ask HN: Why does Seattle feel so risk-averse compared to the Bay Area?

5 points - today at 3:19 AM


Today I posted about an AI startup project I’m working on — zero salary, very early stage, “build for passion.” Dozens of people reached out, but almost all were from the Bay Area. Zero from Seattle.

It made me wonder: why does Seattle’s tech culture feel so optimized for W2/RSUs/stability, while the Bay feels wired for risk-taking and possibility?

Is it just my experience, or have others noticed the same cultural gap?

  • taurath

    today at 7:06 AM

    Could just be that people in the Bay Area are more absurdly wealthy so they have a higher risk appetite… risk tolerance tends to correlate directly with wealth and security - nobody taking zero salary is doing so in leu of food and shelter.

    • tobinfekkes

      today at 3:43 AM

      On the flip side, is there any evidence that there should not be a gap between those two cities? Why is it surprising that there is a gap? It seems like that's expected.

      • yellowcake0

        today at 4:03 AM

        apparently Seattleites have more sense

        • stathibus

          today at 3:22 AM

          There are no zoomer coders drinking YC koolaid and moving to seattle with a backpack and a dream. Seattle is where you go to live a regular american upper-middle class life.